Hi,
We notice an unexpected variation of the estimated library size as a function of the number of reads, even after downsampling with NextSeq data. This is not observed with MiSeq-generated datasets. All analyses were done on Picard.
Did anybody else duplicate this observation? Does this ring a bell?
Thanks for your help,
Kamran
We notice an unexpected variation of the estimated library size as a function of the number of reads, even after downsampling with NextSeq data. This is not observed with MiSeq-generated datasets. All analyses were done on Picard.
Did anybody else duplicate this observation? Does this ring a bell?
Thanks for your help,
Kamran
Comment