Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cub103
    Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 12

    #1

    Target enrichment

    Hi- I wonder if anybody has used the Nimblegen Sequence Capture and sequenced the library using Illumina Solexa Sequencer? How it worked? It will be great if you have a protocol. Thanks.
  • NextGenSeq
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 482

    #2
    See

    Comment

    • bioinfosm
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2008
      • 483

      #3
      This Clin Chem paper uses nimblegen capture followed by Illumina sequencing
      http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/...em.2010.145441
      --
      bioinfosm

      Comment

      • cub103
        Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 12

        #4
        Very useful information. Thanks!

        Comment

        • HGENETIC
          still a novice
          • Jul 2010
          • 34

          #5
          We're in the process of setting this system in our lab in a 96 well format, going to take a few weeks to get it optimised but if you're interested I could send you details on our progress?

          Comment

          • cub103
            Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 12

            #6
            Originally posted by HGENETIC View Post
            We're in the process of setting this system in our lab in a 96 well format, going to take a few weeks to get it optimised but if you're interested I could send you details on our progress?
            Yes, please! Would be so appreciated if you would share this.

            Comment

            • shangyukui
              Junior Member
              • Jul 2010
              • 2

              #7
              very useful information

              Comment

              • NextGenSeq
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2009
                • 482

                #8
                Supposedly new solution phase sequence capture kits from Roche (Nimblegen) will be released in the near future. Their current solution phase capture kits require a purchase of ~100 assays but the new ones supposedly will not.

                Comment

                • ec338
                  Junior Member
                  • Jun 2010
                  • 3

                  #9
                  Originally posted by cub103 View Post
                  Hi- I wonder if anybody has used the Nimblegen Sequence Capture and sequenced the library using Illumina Solexa Sequencer? How it worked? It will be great if you have a protocol. Thanks.
                  Hello,

                  Yes, we had no problem using Nimblegen Seqcap whole exome capture (in solution) with Solexa sequencing (Nimblegen guidelines attachedhttp://www.nimblegen.com/products/li...me_SR_v1p2.pdf). We are currently waiting for results from the combination "Nimblegem array-based sequence capture (custom resequencing)" +"Solexa sequencing" (in-house protocols available if this works).

                  FUTHER QUESTION: our next aim is to try Nimblegen + multiplex Solexa sequencing - did anybody ever try to capture on a Nimblegen array and sequence on GAIIx several captured samples in multiplex?? Any protocols for indexing aso? Any other option(s) for cost-effective small scale capture/resequencing projects (e.g. 2 Mb for 2 patients = when Agilent Sureselect Target enrichment systems would not fit).

                  Thanks,

                  Estelle

                  Comment

                  • csquared
                    Member
                    • May 2008
                    • 67

                    #10
                    We've done a lot of capture/Illumina sequencing. A couple quick comments on our observations:

                    The Nimblegen methods are reasonably good but we use in-house protocols with very consistent results and find the protocols more convenient. One disclaimer is we have only done the head-to-head a couple times so it may not be a 100% fair statement to say in-house is "better" than Illumina. Generally speaking, the standard Illumina lib prep methods will work fine with the Nimblegen arrays with minimal modification.

                    Multiplexing works well. We routinley do 4 samples per array capture and depending on the capture region size, multiplex two or three arrays per sequencing lane. Again, methods are pretty straightforward. We didn't need to reinvent the wheel. Just made sure all the libraries were high quality and the hybridizations, washes, and elutions were performed as optimally as possible.
                    HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology
                    http://www.hudsonalpha.org/gsl

                    Comment

                    • cutcopy11
                      Member
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 19

                      #11
                      Is there a reliable target enrichment system designed for SOLiD???

                      Comment

                      • ec338
                        Junior Member
                        • Jun 2010
                        • 3

                        #12
                        Originally posted by csquared View Post
                        We've done a lot of capture/Illumina sequencing. A couple quick comments on our observations:

                        The Nimblegen methods are reasonably good but we use in-house protocols with very consistent results and find the protocols more convenient. One disclaimer is we have only done the head-to-head a couple times so it may not be a 100% fair statement to say in-house is "better" than Illumina. Generally speaking, the standard Illumina lib prep methods will work fine with the Nimblegen arrays with minimal modification.

                        Multiplexing works well. We routinley do 4 samples per array capture and depending on the capture region size, multiplex two or three arrays per sequencing lane. Again, methods are pretty straightforward. We didn't need to reinvent the wheel. Just made sure all the libraries were high quality and the hybridizations, washes, and elutions were performed as optimally as possible.
                        Hello,
                        Very encouraging comment about multiplexing, thank you! Are you using 385K or 2.1M arrays? Would it be possible to share your in-house protocol / slight modifications from library prep to multiplex capture and sequencing? Many thanks, Estelle.

                        Comment

                        • upenn_ngs
                          Member
                          • Sep 2009
                          • 70

                          #13
                          and solution-based hybridization? has anyone had success placing several individuals into a single capture?

                          Comment

                          • csquared
                            Member
                            • May 2008
                            • 67

                            #14
                            Yes to the multiplexed solution phase question. However, in limited trials, the results were better to divide the input library into multiple, individual, lower volume reactions rather than a single reaction with multiple samples. Of course, your results may vary. We've only done this a small amount with whole-exome and a bit more often with a custom design that was specifically designed to increase the number of probes per capture sequence to enable multiplexed capture.
                            HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology
                            http://www.hudsonalpha.org/gsl

                            Comment

                            • upenn_ngs
                              Member
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 70

                              #15
                              interesting, i have heard rumors illumina is developing exome capture with pooled hybridization to lower cost. also makes the workflow easier with a high volume of samples.

                              Comment

                              Latest Articles

                              Collapse

                              • SEQadmin2
                                16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                                by SEQadmin2




                                NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                                Today, 06:46 AM
                              • SEQadmin2
                                Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                                by SEQadmin2



                                Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                                Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                                ...
                                10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

                              ad_right_rmr

                              Collapse

                              News

                              Collapse

                              Topics Statistics Last Post
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                              0 responses
                              22 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
                              0 responses
                              14 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                              0 responses
                              67 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                              0 responses
                              47 views
                              0 reactions
                              Last Post SEQadmin2  
                              Working...