Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • francesca3877
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2016
    • 1

    #1

    MiSeq/cluster density problems

    Hi everyone,
    my name is Francesca. Yesterday, I completed a new MiSeq run but I had some problems. I use target sequencing technique by Haloplex and I loaded 12 samples. For quantification, I use Tape Station and the results were good. But, the results of MiSeq run was opposite in fact, I obtained a good cluster density 1,337k/mm2 but, the quality was to low 6,1%. I don't understand because I load two of these sempales in other experiments and the results are good.
  • bunce
    Member
    • Sep 2012
    • 55

    #2
    Hi francesca3877,

    There are many, many reason for a poor sequencing run - the #1 cause is usually clustering density (are using using v2 or V3 chemistry). You can't just look at the clustering number and believe it - when a run is over clustered the density maxes out and gives you erroneous numbers.

    have a look at this illumina help guide - and check out the thumbnail images on your run.

    Comment

    • GenoMax
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 7142

      #3
      Originally posted by francesca3877 View Post
      Hi everyone,
      my name is Francesca. Yesterday, I completed a new MiSeq run but I had some problems. I use target sequencing technique by Haloplex and I loaded 12 samples. For quantification, I use Tape Station and the results were good. But, the results of MiSeq run was opposite in fact, I obtained a good cluster density 1,337k/mm2 but, the quality was to low 6,1%. I don't understand because I load two of these sempales in other experiments and the results are good.
      Your best bet is to open a ticket with Illumina tech support for any run that does not meet published spec. Tech support can look at the metrics of the run and determine if there is an issue. If there is an issue you would get free replacement reagents, otherwise you will get an explanation of why you are seeing the results you have.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Today, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      68 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...