Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zhanghomer
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 3

    #1

    illumina DNA library preparation, how to optimize the results?

    we used the adapter with a 3-bases tag in the 3' terminator.

    The PCR primers are the universe primers from illumina, 16 cycles

    the PCR products are tested by Agilent 2100, the results are below attachment.

    as you see, noncovalent concatamerization of fragments (“bird-nesting”) was observed. so, how to optimize the conditions to reduce the bird-nesting.
    Attached Files
  • NextGenSeq
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 482

    #2
    Use the NuGen kit.

    Comment

    • andibody
      Member
      • Mar 2008
      • 45

      #3
      we too see it happen from time to time but we haven't been able to nail it down to specific conditions. hope we get more input from other users.

      Comment

      • zhanghomer
        Junior Member
        • Sep 2010
        • 3

        #4
        Someone used another size selected gel extration followed the PCR amplification to solve this problem, but i think it will cut down the library quantity.

        Comment

        • andibody
          Member
          • Mar 2008
          • 45

          #5
          Nextera says bird-nesting isn't a problem:
          "After the Nextera tagmentation reaction and PCR, you may notice an apparent fragment size of 500 bases (or greater) when the DNA is analyzed on an Agilent Bioanalyzer. This phenomenon is called “bird nesting”: the amplified, Transposome™-tagged DNA fragments get intertwined up and appear longer than they really are. This is not a problem. The denaturation step during bridge PCR will eliminate this tangle and the average peak size will settle back down to the expected 200- to 400-base range."

          Comment

          • peromhc
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 108

            #6
            I bet too much template DNA added to the PCR. Was it qualtified with Pico Green prior to the PCR step?

            Comment

            • andibody
              Member
              • Mar 2008
              • 45

              #7
              peaks of bianalyzer result seem small, wouldn't you expects lots of material if template DNA was abundant?
              (I suppose 1 ul was used for quantification)

              Comment

              • zhanghomer
                Junior Member
                • Sep 2010
                • 3

                #8
                Originally posted by peromhc View Post
                I bet too much template DNA added to the PCR. Was it qualtified with Pico Green prior to the PCR step?
                We qualtified the template DNA with Qbit, and add 50ng DNA template into each 50μl PCR reaction.

                ps, the bird-nesting was appeared within 100 to 200bp, rather than "intertwined up and appear longer " , as Nextera says.

                by the way, did anyone use the adapters with 3' index tag? do the tag index

                will interfere the PCR efficiency ?

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
                  by SEQadmin2




                  NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
                  Today, 06:46 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                  Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                  ...
                  10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
                0 responses
                22 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
                0 responses
                14 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
                0 responses
                67 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
                0 responses
                47 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...