Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dross11
    Member
    • Mar 2015
    • 14

    #1

    Acceptable Passing Filter (%PF)

    I am running some bisulfite converted amplicon-seq libraries (Fluidigm Access Array) on a MiSeq with version2 300-cycle reagents without PhiX (I will be spiking in 5% PhiX in future runs). As this is a low diversity pool and it has been bisulfite treated, I have been expecting lower than normal quality scores, however, I am seeing a rather low %PF. I have run two pools so far which have the following run metrics:

    cluster density %PF AVG%Q30
    Run1 935K/mm2 75.93% 88.84%
    Run2 695K/mm2 65.4% 85.36%

    I am not sure whether I should be concerned about the low %PF or whether it is expected for bisulfite converted amplicon libraries. Is there anything I can do to help increase the %PF? Can I still continue with analysing the resulting FASTQs from these runs or is that a bad idea?

    Any help would be greatly appreciated.


    Edit:
    I checked the optic images and they not overclustered.

    The first 22 bp of my insert is the Fluidigm sequencing primer and because the %PF is determined after the first 25 cycles the machine might 'think' all the libraries/clusters are homogenous fooling it into determining the run as being overclustered and giving a low %PF. Does this reasoning seem like an explanation?

    Edit2:
    Yield of the first run was 5.28Gbp and 4.07Gbp and Illumina advertise the maximum v2 yield as 5.1Gb, suggesting most clusters are in actuality passing filter.
    Last edited by dross11; 05-11-2017, 09:00 AM. Reason: reinstated last edit
  • thermophile
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2015
    • 243

    #2
    spiking in phiX should increase your pf% but those numbers aren't horrible given you didn't spike in. For my amplicon runs, I spike in 15% phiX and usually see ~80-90% pf

    No reason not to use this data, what's passed filter and been demultiplexed should be fine
    Microbial ecologist, running a sequencing core. I have lots of strong opinions on how to survey communities, pretty sure some are even correct.

    Comment

    • WhatsOEver
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2012
      • 215

      #3
      Do you need the fluidigm seq primer for anything in the downstream processing? If not, I would suggest to run 10-20 dark cycles (depends if the primer seq is really at the start of every fragment) in the sequencing protocol. If you have a normal seq complexity after the primer, you will not run into any problems in terms of cluster identification.

      Comment

      • dross11
        Member
        • Mar 2015
        • 14

        #4
        I performed a run today. I spiked in 5% PhiX and the %PF is at 73.49% and quality is at ~94% with a cluster density of ~1100K/mm2. I'll try 15% next time but I am fairly certain the lowish %PF is due to the sequencing primers presence within my insert. I will also look into performing 15 dark cycles next time round too (this is really very clever).

        Thank you for your help and reassurance
        Last edited by dross11; 05-12-2017, 08:26 AM. Reason: More info

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        36 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        43 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...