We're running and mapping human samples on our new(ish) HiSeq2000 and we're seeing some low mapping rates out of ELAND. Even if you don't run ELAND, I'd be interested in hearing what other HiSeq users' mapping rates look like with Bowtie/BWA/whatever.
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
6% is kind of surprisingly low. We're seeing 20% on our transcriptome runs with Bowtie, but I suspect that may have something to do with the library construction and how the paired reads may overlap (which Bowtie can not deal with, minimum insert size is 0).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lee Sam View Post6% is kind of surprisingly low. We're seeing 20% on our transcriptome runs with Bowtie, but I suspect that may have something to do with the library construction and how the paired reads may overlap (which Bowtie can not deal with, minimum insert size is 0).
Comment
-
I realize the OP asked about the HiSeq. We don't have a HiSeq, but I wouldn't expect the results to be very different from the GAIIx since they use the same chemistry so I'll throw this out there for comparison.
We recently sequenced a maize transcriptome with 101bp single end reads. We truncated to 76 bp and used tophat, which uses bowtie, and we were able to map 66% of the reads.
I think something is wrong if you are only mapping 6%. Was the library ribo-depleted or polyA? Was the library checked on a bioanalyzer to see if primer-dimers were present and to assess how much rRNA was present in the sample? We have had user prepared libraries that have had as much as 80% rRNA present in the final library.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kopi-o View PostWe have good mapping rates with HiSeq RNA-seq on human samples, >70% and up to ~80% with bwa or TopHat. (PE 2x100)
best wishes!
Comment
-
Originally posted by NextGenSeq View PostIs this mapping to the genome or the transcriptome (coding exons)?
Also, if your RNA has mycoplasma contamination (from cell culture) you will get much lower mapping rates.
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...-
Channel: Articles
04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
-
by seqadmin
Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...-
Channel: Articles
03-22-2024, 06:39 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
0 responses
30 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
32 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
0 responses
28 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
0 responses
53 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
Comment