Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cnicolet
    Member
    • Dec 2008
    • 35

    #1

    CBot vs. Cluster station

    Hello:
    Illumina says the cBot will give slightly higher cluster numbers than the cluster station with the same library concentration. Has anyone seen this? How much higher? We are using 10 pM for the library currently, to get 350,000/mm2 on the old cluster station.

    Thanks for your help!

    CN
  • lwwhu
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 2

    #2
    I guess it depends on your library quantification, too. We constantly get 400K/mm2 with 6.5 pM input (on cBot).

    Comment

    • NextGenSeq
      Senior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 482

      #3
      The cBot is definitely more consistent and gives higher cluster numbers. We get more like 500 to 600K/mm2 PF clusters
      Last edited by NextGenSeq; 11-17-2010, 07:34 AM.

      Comment

      • mnkyboy
        Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 87

        #4
        Originally posted by lwwhu View Post
        I guess it depends on your library quantification, too. We constantly get 400K/mm2 with 6.5 pM input (on cBot).
        I get about that for passing filter clusters with RNA-seq libraries on the cBOT.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        14 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        68 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        47 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...