Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • SK-N-BE
    Member
    • Apr 2018
    • 14

    #1

    Expected genome size vs. assembly total bases

    Hello,
    I sequenced a bacterial genome with an expected genome size of 2,9 Mbp.
    One of my sequenced isolate got 2,98 whereas the second one 3,12 Mbp. Are those results in the range expected? How much may the expected and the resulted genome size differ?
  • Bukowski
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 388

    #2
    Maybe. There is not enough data here to answer the question. How did you determine the expected genome size? What is the variation in known genome sizes?

    Have a look at:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/...lus%20subtilis[Organism]&cmd=DetailsSearch

    median total length (Mb): 4.13745

    Type strain is 4.22Mb

    Now go here:

    This resource organizes information on genomes including sequences, maps, chromosomes, assemblies, and annotations.


    Smallest genome is 2.68Mb. Largest is 5.4Mb (ignoring the chimeric one) - but the bulk are 3.8Mb to 4.5Mb - 0.7Mb difference in a relatively small genome.

    So I'd look at the variation in the published genomes to decide. The example above is just to show methodology not to start a discussion on the completeness of genomes or genome plasticity in B.subtilis

    But your assemblies could be very different in terms of content for a number of reasons, and without assessing them it is impossible to say what is 'expected'

    Comment

    • SK-N-BE
      Member
      • Apr 2018
      • 14

      #3
      Hello,
      thank you for your reply.
      I was working with L.monocytogenes and I now found that the Genome size I got is in the range of those genomes that are found on NCBI.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Today, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      15 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      68 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      48 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...