Does anyone know if there is an exome capture kit that captures exons, intervening introns and promoter of all genes or under development? If we can then use PacBio to sequence the fragments, we can find trinculeotide repeats, phasing, etc in one go. I think the coverage will probably be around 500Mb for human. Does this kind of kit makes sense with the Sequel machine?
Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
-
Last edited by Bukowski; 11-04-2015, 09:01 AM.
-
Why would you want to do that?
1) A 40kb fragment would have low read quality as it would be a single pass read
2) 6kb fragments overlap quite nicely
Resolving large repeats is still not a solved issue even on the PacBio. And the error profile is still reduced by depth/high pass reads of insert.Last edited by Bukowski; 11-04-2015, 01:17 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ymc View Post
If you read the '20kb' library preparation protocol, pay specific attention to the Blue Pippin size selection step. You don't generate a library of 20kb fragments with it
Comment
-
ymc, do you mean like capturing specific gene regions using using NimbleGen SeqCap EZ?
We at PacBio have used the oncology panel on both gDNA and cDNA. I don't think we have a poster for that yet (or I can't find it off the top of my head right now). But if this is what you are thinking, it does work.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Magdoll View Postymc, do you mean like capturing specific gene regions using using NimbleGen SeqCap EZ?
We at PacBio have used the oncology panel on both gDNA and cDNA. I don't think we have a poster for that yet (or I can't find it off the top of my head right now). But if this is what you are thinking, it does work.
Comment
-
Hi ymc,
After a brief conversation with my colleagues it appears that we haven't used the TruSight panel on PacBio. But we also don't see why theoretically (with some minor tweaks) it would not work on PacBio platform.
The NimbleGen panel was originally designed for short reads. We simply used it on PacBio for gDNA capture (fragment to longer pieces) and cDNA capture (using full-length cDNA).
I would imagine PacBio's 6kb capture protocol would be able to work on this.
Best,
--Liz
Comment
-
Originally posted by Magdoll View PostHi ymc,
After a brief conversation with my colleagues it appears that we haven't used the TruSight panel on PacBio. But we also don't see why theoretically (with some minor tweaks) it would not work on PacBio platform.
The NimbleGen panel was originally designed for short reads. We simply used it on PacBio for gDNA capture (fragment to longer pieces) and cDNA capture (using full-length cDNA).
I would imagine PacBio's 6kb capture protocol would be able to work on this.
Best,
--Liz
Comment
-
Dear all, I am thinking about making a custom panel of 20+ genes and then use PacBio to sequence them. My panel will try to cover each gene from promoter to 3'UTR, so the longer the read the better. Which custome panel kit is the best for this? What are the pros and cons of capture-based method and PCR method?
I found this Nimblegen capture kit poster saying it can generate 6kb fragments that has a few fragments at 17kb
Is there a custom kit that can do 20kb fragment?
Comment
-
Dear all, I am thinking about making a custom panel of 20+ genes and then use PacBio to sequence them. My panel will try to cover each gene from promoter to 3'UTR, so the longer the read the better. Which custome panel kit is the best for this? What are the pros and cons of capture-based method and PCR method?
1- The region is divergent among samples preventing unique primer design
2- You only have partial sequence and want to capture flanking 3' and 5' region
3- No information is available on paralogs or targeting a gene family or genes sharing a domain
Capture would be more expensive because:
1- library prep cost
2- Custom panel design expenses
3- Sequence capture is a long process
4- Only a subset of captured fragments would be on target wasting sequencing
Comment
-
Originally posted by nucacidhunter View PostLong range PCR would be the easiest and cheapest option for resequencing 20 genes unless following applies:
1- The region is divergent among samples preventing unique primer design
2- You only have partial sequence and want to capture flanking 3' and 5' region
3- No information is available on paralogs or targeting a gene family or genes sharing a domain
Capture would be more expensive because:
1- library prep cost
2- Custom panel design expenses
3- Sequence capture is a long process
4- Only a subset of captured fragments would be on target wasting sequencing
If I use long range PCR, does that mean I can take advantage P6C4 chemistry's avg 14k reads and some occasional 40k reads?
Comment
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by seqadmin
Proteins are often described as the workhorses of the cell, and identifying their sequences is key to understanding their role in biological processes and disease. Currently, the most common technique used to determine protein sequences is mass spectrometry. While still a valuable tool, mass spectrometry faces several limitations and requires a highly experienced scientist familiar with the equipment to operate it. Additionally, other proteomic methods, like affinity assays, are constrained...-
Channel: Articles
04-04-2024, 04:25 PM -
-
by seqadmin
Despite advancements in sequencing platforms and related sample preparation technologies, certain sample types continue to present significant challenges that can compromise sequencing results. Pedro Echave, Senior Manager of the Global Business Segment at Revvity, explained that the success of a sequencing experiment ultimately depends on the amount and integrity of the nucleic acid template (RNA or DNA) obtained from a sample. “The better the quality of the nucleic acid isolated...-
Channel: Articles
03-22-2024, 06:39 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Started by seqadmin, 04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
0 responses
24 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-11-2024, 12:08 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
0 responses
25 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 10:19 PM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
0 responses
23 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-10-2024, 09:21 AM
|
||
Started by seqadmin, 04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
0 responses
52 views
0 likes
|
Last Post
by seqadmin
04-04-2024, 09:00 AM
|
Comment