Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nxtgenkid10
    Member
    • Feb 2011
    • 16

    #1

    Velvet Interpretation

    Hi I m trying to run velevt with the a bacterial genome with the following condition

    k-mer=31 -cov_cutoff auto -exp_cov auto -ins_length 1000 -exp_cov 5 n50 of 1399.

    k-mer=15 -cov_cutoff auto -exp_cov auto -ins_length 1000 -exp_cov 5 shows results to be n50 of 11.

    My Concerns

    1 :how k-mer effects the contig formation
    2 : Which Files i have to see for the # of contigs formed by a particular set of parameters
  • nangillala
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 9

    #2
    Hi,
    Originally posted by nxtgenkid10 View Post
    1 :how k-mer effects the contig formation
    Let me cite the Velvet Manual here:
    As is often the case, it’s a trade-off between specificity and sensitivity. Longer kmers bring you more specificity (i.e. less spurious overlaps) but lowers coverage. . . so there’s a sweet spot to be found with time and experience.
    You can read a bit more on page 16 of the Velvet Manual. There's a lot of discussion about the choice of k-mers in publications and on this forum.
    If your dataset is small enough you may try to use Velvet with multiple k-mers (see page 7 in the manual).

    Originally posted by nxtgenkid10 View Post
    2 : Which Files i have to see for the # of contigs formed by a particular set of parameters
    You can always just use
    Code:
    grep -c ">" contigs.fasta
    This works for all assemblies in fasta-format.

    When using Velvet you get the Log file which tells you something like:
    Code:
    Median coverage depth = X
    Final graph has X nodes and n50 of X, max X, total X, using X/X reads

    Comment

    • nxtgenkid10
      Member
      • Feb 2011
      • 16

      #3
      Originally posted by nangillala View Post
      Hi,

      Let me cite the Velvet Manual here:
      You can read a bit more on page 16 of the Velvet Manual. There's a lot of discussion about the choice of k-mers in publications and on this forum.
      If your dataset is small enough you may try to use Velvet with multiple k-mers (see page 7 in the manual).


      You can always just use
      Code:
      grep -c ">" contigs.fasta
      This works for all assemblies in fasta-format.

      When using Velvet you get the Log file which tells you something like:
      Code:
      Median coverage depth = X
      Final graph has X nodes and n50 of X, max X, total X, using X/X reads
      What my problem is with that only

      I used the k-mer to be 15 in velveth and in velvetg -cov_cutoff auto -exp_cov auto -ins_length 1000 -exp_cov 5

      so as far as my understanding the contig.fa should have vaule greater than 2k in my case 30 but my files have such entries too y is it so and yu can notice as in below cov is 0.000 tooo

      >NODE_9_length_21_cov_0.000000
      GGGAACCGACATGAGGAACTTAGCACGGTAAACAG
      >NODE_18_length_23_cov_0.000000
      CCCGCGTTCAGACGCAGTTCAGACATATGGTGGACCG
      >NODE_24_length_16_cov_0.000000
      GGTTAAGAGCCTGCTACGCAGGCTCTTAAC
      >NODE_39_length_31_cov_0.000000
      TGCGCGCTGGCCAGACCGGCTTGTGCGCTGCGCAGCTGAGCGTTT
      >NODE_56_length_15_cov_0.000000
      CTGTCTATCAGCTGTCTCTCTTCAAGCGC
      >NODE_66_length_29_cov_0.000000
      CGATAACGCGCTGCCACTGACGACAGTCCAGGGTATCTCCCTC

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
        by SEQadmin2




        NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
        Today, 06:46 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
        by SEQadmin2



        Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

        Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
        ...
        10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
      0 responses
      22 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
      0 responses
      14 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
      0 responses
      67 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
      0 responses
      47 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...