Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • nako
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2013
    • 5

    using data from multiple platforms/technologies

    Hi all - I have a few data sets (assembled sequences), which were generated using a few technologies - Sanger, Illumina (assembled with trinity), 454 (assembled with iAssembler, or in another way with mira and cap3). I would like to use all these datasets for a comparative analysis. My analysis requires that I minimize the amount of redundancies in each data set - that is, I prefer to have alternative splice variants clustered together, and choose a consensus for all of the together, rather than to have them separated.
    I would highly appreciate any suggestions. Currently, I am thinking about running CAP3 on each assembled data set one time, in order to reduce redundancy and also homogenize the data a bit. I am new to all this thought, so I am not sure if this is the best options. I did compare cap3 and cdhit on artifical splice variants that I created - and reached the conclusion that cap3 is better for this job.
    Thank you in advance for your help
  • Blahah404
    Member
    • Dec 2011
    • 48

    #2
    I use `usearch cluster_smallmem` to reduce redundancy. It's similar to CDHIT, but much faster. CAP3 can be useful for creating superassemblies to merge different assemblies together, but it's so slow that I wouldn't want to have to run it many times.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    19 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    53 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...