Seqanswers Leaderboard Ad

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Velvet assembly

    I have run velvet for hash length 31 and 51 without setting any parameters.Then I calculated exp_cov and cov_cutoff using given perl script (velvet-estimate-exp_cov.pl).

    For the hash 31, I found velvetg parameters exp_cov and cov_cutoff to be 1 and 0. I expected these values to go further down for hash 51 (since higher K-mer gives lower coverage). But surprisingly, it was 17 and 0. I have attached the outputs of the perl script for two hash lengths.

    Could anyone explain this?

    Expected coverage

    1 | 19 |
    2 | 16 |
    3 | 3 |
    4 | 36 | *
    5 | 66 | **
    6 | 69 | **
    7 | 108 | ****
    8 | 119 | ****
    9 | 169 | ******
    10 | 196 | ********
    11 | 261 | **********
    12 | 327 | *************
    13 | 503 | ********************
    14 | 635 | **************************
    15 | 970 | ***************************************
    16 | 1210 | *************************************************
    17 | 1459 | ************************************************************
    18 | 1330 | ******************************************************
    19 | 951 | ***************************************
    20 | 545 | **********************
    21 | 286 | ***********
    22 | 160 | ******
    23 | 84 | ***
    24 | 48 | *
    25 | 36 | *
    26 | 20 |
    27 | 12 |
    28 | 10 |
    29 | 11 |
    30 | 10 |
    31 | 8 |
    32 | 6 |
    33 | 8 |
    34 | 3 |
    35 | 3 |
    36 | 2 |
    37 | 2 |
    38 | 3 |
    39 | 4 |
    40 | 1 |
    43 | 1 |
    44 | 2 |
    45 | 1 |
    47 | 1 |
    48 | 1 |
    49 | 2 |
    50 | 1 |
    51 | 1 |
    53 | 1 |
    55 | 1 |
    61 | 2 |
    66 | 1 |
    67 | 1 |
    74 | 1 |
    77 | 2 |
    85 | 1 |
    86 | 2 |
    87 | 1 |
    93 | 1 |
    95 | 2 |
    105 | 2 |
    114 | 1 |
    127 | 1 |
    138 | 1 |
    139 | 1 |
    142 | 1 |
    144 | 1 |
    145 | 1 |
    147 | 1 |
    157 | 1 |
    169 | 1 |
    173 | 1 |
    178 | 1 |
    185 | 1 |
    219 | 1 |
    236 | 1 |
    263 | 1 |
    273 | 1 |
    278 | 1 |
    291 | 1 |
    312 | 1 |
    313 | 1 |
    316 | 1 |
    317 | 1 |
    324 | 1 |
    329 | 1 |
    332 | 1 |
    347 | 1 |
    350 | 1 |
    366 | 1 |
    369 | 1 |
    371 | 1 |
    399 | 1 |
    411 | 1 |
    430 | 1 |
    433 | 1 |
    455 | 1 |
    492 | 1 |
    502 | 1 |
    506 | 1 |
    522 | 1 |
    546 | 1 |
    561 | 1 |
    706 | 1 |
    775 | 1 |
    Predicted expected coverage: 17
    velvetg parameters: -exp_cov 17 -cov_cutoff 0

    Observed results

    1 | 2773 | ************************************************************
    2 | 1740 | *************************************
    3 | 374 | ********
    4 | 41 |
    5 | 14 |
    6 | 5 |
    7 | 4 |
    8 | 3 |
    9 | 8 |
    10 | 12 |
    11 | 17 |
    12 | 19 |
    13 | 28 |
    14 | 30 |
    15 | 54 | *
    16 | 63 | *
    17 | 83 | *
    18 | 110 | **
    19 | 154 | ***
    20 | 174 | ***
    21 | 233 | *****
    22 | 260 | *****
    23 | 339 | *******
    24 | 400 | ********
    25 | 493 | **********
    26 | 595 | ************
    27 | 681 | **************
    28 | 835 | ******************
    29 | 897 | *******************
    30 | 1148 | ************************
    31 | 1234 | **************************
    32 | 1449 | *******************************
    33 | 1500 | ********************************
    34 | 1661 | ***********************************
    35 | 1839 | ***************************************
    36 | 1972 | ******************************************
    37 | 2150 | **********************************************
    38 | 2208 | ***********************************************
    39 | 2235 | ************************************************
    40 | 2469 | *****************************************************
    41 | 2433 | ****************************************************
    42 | 2528 | ******************************************************
    43 | 2467 | *****************************************************
    44 | 2462 | *****************************************************
    45 | 2387 | ***************************************************
    46 | 2403 | ***************************************************
    47 | 2281 | *************************************************
    48 | 2206 | ***********************************************
    49 | 2101 | *********************************************
    50 | 1981 | ******************************************
    51 | 1866 | ****************************************
    52 | 1661 | ***********************************
    53 | 1640 | ***********************************
    54 | 1558 | *********************************
    55 | 1402 | ******************************
    56 | 1328 | ****************************
    57 | 1154 | ************************
    58 | 1093 | ***********************
    59 | 1016 | *********************
    60 | 907 | *******************
    61 | 842 | ******************
    62 | 789 | *****************
    63 | 730 | ***************
    64 | 603 | *************
    65 | 631 | *************
    66 | 527 | ***********
    67 | 499 | **********
    68 | 437 | *********
    69 | 353 | *******
    70 | 333 | *******
    71 | 356 | *******
    72 | 280 | ******
    73 | 261 | *****
    74 | 249 | *****
    75 | 255 | *****
    76 | 215 | ****
    77 | 172 | ***
    78 | 164 | ***
    79 | 137 | **
    80 | 143 | ***
    81 | 132 | **
    82 | 119 | **
    83 | 118 | **
    84 | 79 | *
    85 | 74 | *
    86 | 67 | *
    87 | 84 | *
    88 | 67 | *
    89 | 64 | *
    90 | 46 |
    91 | 59 | *
    92 | 44 |
    93 | 47 | *
    94 | 43 |
    95 | 24 |
    96 | 29 |
    97 | 25 |
    98 | 26 |
    99 | 20 |
    100 | 20 |
    101 | 12 |
    102 | 16 |
    103 | 12 |
    104 | 11 |
    105 | 11 |
    106 | 13 |
    107 | 12 |
    108 | 7 |
    109 | 6 |
    110 | 6 |
    111 | 4 |
    112 | 7 |
    113 | 10 |
    114 | 6 |
    115 | 2 |
    116 | 3 |
    117 | 2 |
    119 | 1 |
    120 | 5 |
    121 | 3 |
    122 | 2 |
    123 | 4 |
    125 | 3 |
    126 | 3 |
    127 | 2 |
    128 | 1 |
    129 | 1 |
    130 | 1 |
    134 | 2 |
    135 | 1 |
    136 | 3 |
    137 | 2 |
    141 | 3 |
    142 | 1 |
    146 | 3 |
    147 | 1 |
    148 | 1 |
    150 | 2 |
    151 | 3 |
    153 | 1 |
    158 | 1 |
    166 | 1 |
    170 | 1 |
    175 | 1 |
    179 | 1 |
    181 | 1 |
    185 | 1 |
    186 | 1 |
    190 | 1 |
    196 | 2 |
    201 | 1 |
    206 | 2 |
    207 | 1 |
    209 | 1 |
    217 | 1 |
    221 | 1 |
    222 | 1 |
    227 | 1 |
    229 | 1 |
    237 | 1 |
    241 | 1 |
    243 | 1 |
    258 | 1 |
    261 | 1 |
    262 | 1 |
    267 | 1 |
    269 | 1 |
    272 | 1 |
    273 | 1 |
    282 | 1 |
    287 | 1 |
    288 | 1 |
    290 | 1 |
    294 | 1 |
    295 | 1 |
    299 | 1 |
    303 | 1 |
    310 | 1 |
    318 | 1 |
    321 | 1 |
    324 | 1 |
    325 | 1 |
    329 | 1 |
    330 | 2 |
    332 | 1 |
    334 | 1 |
    340 | 1 |
    341 | 2 |
    347 | 1 |
    359 | 1 |
    360 | 1 |
    361 | 1 |
    363 | 1 |
    368 | 1 |
    373 | 1 |
    376 | 1 |
    380 | 1 |
    404 | 1 |
    411 | 1 |
    422 | 1 |
    434 | 1 |
    435 | 1 |
    444 | 1 |
    451 | 2 |
    463 | 1 |
    464 | 1 |
    465 | 1 |
    473 | 1 |
    500 | 1 |
    510 | 1 |
    514 | 1 |
    516 | 1 |
    524 | 1 |
    551 | 1 |
    558 | 1 |
    561 | 1 |
    562 | 1 |
    589 | 1 |
    610 | 1 |
    637 | 1 |
    645 | 1 |
    674 | 1 |
    716 | 1 |
    718 | 1 |
    741 | 1 |
    775 | 1 |
    777 | 1 |
    778 | 1 |
    787 | 1 |
    797 | 1 |
    806 | 1 |
    826 | 1 |
    861 | 1 |
    862 | 1 |
    880 | 1 |
    937 | 1 |
    949 | 1 |
    962 | 1 |
    965 | 1 |
    971 | 1 |
    979 | 1 |
    983 | 1 |
    1003 | 1 |
    1036 | 1 |
    1064 | 1 |
    1087 | 1 |
    1100 | 1 |
    1287 | 1 |
    1342 | 1 |
    1365 | 1 |
    1408 | 1 |
    1433 | 1 |
    1512 | 1 |
    1649 | 1 |
    Predicted expected coverage: 1
    velvetg parameters: -exp_cov 1 -cov_cutoff 0

  • #2
    It looks like the perl script simply selects the mode of the k-mer frequency histogram: 1 and 17 are the most frequent values in the two histograms you show. The histogram for k=31 looks as expected to me (many low-frequency k-mers which represent k-mers with sequencing errors then a proper distribution of k-mers around 40-45X). The k=51 histogram does not look right. I would guess the k=51 assembly failed for some reason - probably not enough coverage to support that high kmer length.

    I suggest trying the VelvetOptimiser script which is included with velvet.
    Last edited by jts; 12-12-2010, 09:03 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Thanks a lot jts. I will try velvetOptimiser.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • seqadmin
        Addressing Off-Target Effects in CRISPR Technologies
        by seqadmin






        The first FDA-approved CRISPR-based therapy marked the transition of therapeutic gene editing from a dream to reality1. CRISPR technologies have streamlined gene editing, and CRISPR screens have become an important approach for identifying genes involved in disease processes2. This technique introduces targeted mutations across numerous genes, enabling large-scale identification of gene functions, interactions, and pathways3. Identifying the full range...
        08-27-2024, 04:44 AM
      • seqadmin
        Selecting and Optimizing mRNA Library Preparations
        by seqadmin



        Sequencing mRNA provides a snapshot of cellular activity, allowing researchers to study the dynamics of cellular processes, compare gene expression across different tissue types, and gain insights into the mechanisms of complex diseases. “mRNA’s central role in the dogma of molecular biology makes it a logical and relevant focus for transcriptomic studies,” stated Sebastian Aguilar Pierlé, Ph.D., Application Development Lead at Inorevia. “One of the major hurdles for...
        08-07-2024, 12:11 PM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by seqadmin, 08-27-2024, 04:40 AM
      0 responses
      16 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 08-22-2024, 05:00 AM
      0 responses
      293 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 08-21-2024, 10:49 AM
      0 responses
      135 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Started by seqadmin, 08-19-2024, 05:12 AM
      0 responses
      124 views
      0 likes
      Last Post seqadmin  
      Working...
      X