Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ETHANol
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 308

    MeDIP-seq - input sample needed?

    I've prepared some MeDIP-seq libraries and they appear pretty good and ready to be run on the HiSeq. My question is, do I need to run input control libraries like we do with ChIP-seq or is the fragmentation of the genome and subsequent amplification so even that it is not necessary?

    I have samples from several cell lines and was thinking of just running one input control?
    --------------
    Ethan
  • msheldon
    Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 15

    #2
    Input controls are not a bad idea, what did you use to fragment?
    Are you using methylated or non-methylated adapters?

    Comment

    • ETHANol
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2010
      • 308

      #3
      I used the Covaris S2 and their suggested settings using microTubes.

      For adapters, I used adapters with the TruSeq sequences synthesized by IDT and non-methylated. I am aware that the TruSeq adapters from Illumina are methylated.

      My libraries have about a 50-fold difference in signal between what should be a methylated region and a CpG-less sequence using qPCR and normalized to input. From what I understand this is good enrichment for MeDIP. Do others see better enrichment?
      --------------
      Ethan

      Comment

      • msheldon
        Member
        • Jul 2011
        • 15

        #4
        that will work. we sequence material with 40-60 fold greater signal. let me know how it turns out.

        Comment

        • helitron
          Junior Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 4

          #5
          Originally posted by ETHANol View Post
          My libraries have about a 50-fold difference in signal between what should be a methylated region and a CpG-less sequence using qPCR and normalized to input. From what I understand this is good enrichment for MeDIP. Do others see better enrichment?
          hey,
          I always compare methylated regions to unmethylated regions of similar CpG density to measure enrichments - that way you avoid getting into sonication artifacts. Especially if you are testing your libraries and not the IP material for enrichment.
          E.g. use a methylated CpG island vs an unmethylated one (take for example a housekeeping gene promoter). Don't know what cell type you're using but methylated CG islands are mostly at sperm specific promoters or imprinting control regions. Even if only one allele is methylated, it will still give you a good signal to measure enrichment. Stay away from repeats and transposons.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            Yesterday, 11:10 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
            by SEQadmin2



            Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

            There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
            07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:04 AM
          0 responses
          10 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
          0 responses
          7 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          14 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          31 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...