Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • gruberjd
    Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 13

    #1

    Calling variants when mapping reads from different species than reference

    Hi all,

    My SNP calling pipeline seems to be poorly performing when tasked with mapping reads from a sample that is from a related species from the reference assembly. (This sort of thing is common in plant breeding.) Obviously the more variants that differentiate reference and sample, the harder it is to map reads correctly, so it makes sense that this is harder than finding intraspecies SNPs.

    Nonetheless, I am 100% confident it can do better than it is doing. I can see from the bam that there are reads mapping to a given region, and even then most of the time my SNP caller (the last free version of GATK) fails to emit genotypes, even of sites that simply match the reference. Interestingly, the few times that it does emit a genotype, it is highly highly biased towards A&T calls.

    Is any of this a classic symptom of a parameter I need to adjust, or a sign that I need to switch SNP callers? Can anyone cite literature that compares SNP callers' performance (or influence of different parameters) in this particular challenging task? I haven't had much luck searching.

    Thanks!

    Jonathan
  • Brian Bushnell
    Super Moderator
    • Jan 2014
    • 2709

    #2
    I don't have any papers, but I'd be interested in seeing if you get better results using BBMap for mapping and BBMap's variant caller for variant-calling. BBMap can align at short reads at quite low identity, so it's good for cross-species alignment (you can increase sensitivity with the "minid" flag). Assuming you have paired interleaved reads in a single file, and starting with the raw reads, the commands would be something like:

    Code:
    bbduk.sh in=reads.fq out=clean.fq ref=adapters.fa ktrim=r k=23 mink=11 hdist=1 tpe tbo
    bbmap.sh in=clean.fq ref=ref.fa out=mapped.sam
    callvariants.sh in=mapped.sam ref=ref.fa ploidy=2 out=vars.vcf
    For multiple samples, the callvariants command would be:

    Code:
    callvariants.sh in=sample1.sam,sample2.sam,sample3.sam ref=ref.fa ploidy=2 out=vars.vcf multisample
    At JGI we are using CallVariants a lot these days for various strains of things mapped to a divergent reference (largely Aspergillus, E.coli, and some plants from cross-breeding experiments). I don't really do variant-calling in production any more (just for testing and development) but the people who do at JGI switched to CallVariants because, as they told me, it performs much better than their prior pipelines (GATK, FreeBayes, and a couple others), particularly for variants with low allele fractions (using the "rarity" flag). In general I think it's best to use the defaults, though of course you need to specify ploidy correctly.

    Comment

    • gruberjd
      Member
      • Nov 2011
      • 13

      #3
      Brian-- Thanks. I'll give BBMap a shot and will certainly report success if I find it!

      Comment

      • Brian Bushnell
        Super Moderator
        • Jan 2014
        • 2709

        #4
        Great - I look forward to your feedback.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        30 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        22 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        39 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        45 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...