Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Khaz
    Junior Member
    • Apr 2012
    • 1

    #1

    TopHat Fusion: -r parameter sensitivity

    I am running TopHat (2.0.0) on RNASeq data with the goal of locating gene fusions and was wondering how sensitive TopHat is with respect to the -r (insert size) parameter when determining fusions. I have seen threads discussing this parameter, but not with respect to fusion calling.

    The RNASeq data is coming from Illumina HiSeq experiments, and insert seems to vary from ~150 to ~300 with very large std-dev (up to 1000s of bp). This is according to samstats when reads are mapped to the genome. The reads are paired, 50bp each.

    Since I am running TopHat on many files in parallel, pre-computing the insert size statistics is an expensive step that I would like to avoid. I am hoping that setting the -r to a constant value and defining a large -insert-std-dev could avoid tweaking the -r on a per-sample level. In several trial runs, changing the -r parameter for samples with seemingly large mean insert sizes resulted in no changes to the filtered fusions reported.

    Given these observations I was wondering how important is getting the -r right versus setting the std-dev higher and how exactly TopHat uses the -r parameter in the context of finding fusions.

    Any information on the above would be much appreciated. Thanks!

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
33 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
21 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
72 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...