Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • jppichon
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2013
    • 1

    estimateVarianceFunctions

    Hi,

    I tried to do the analysis of the "example.File" with DESeq 1.10.1.
    The following message appeared:

    Erreur : 'estimateVarianceFunctions' is defunct.
    Use 'estimateDispersions' instead.
    See help("Defunct")

    So I tried to use "estimateDispersions". It seemed to be successful, but after running the "nbinomTest" function all padj value were equal to 1 and resVar weren't calculated.

    Does someone has experimented the same?

    JP
  • Simon Anders
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 995

    #2
    Please always use a current version of both the package and the documentation. You seem to be reading an old version of the vignette if it still mentions 'estimateVarianceFunction'.

    As for the p values, you will have to give us much more information on what you are doing before we can make any guesses.

    Comment

    • Baoqing
      Member
      • Jan 2013
      • 24

      #3
      p value is negative

      Hi, Guys

      I probably followed the old version as well. But after the error message, i changed to run:
      cds = estimateDispersions(cds)
      res = nbinomTest(cds, "T", "N") #T, N two treatments, all of my samples are single reads

      When i looked at the results:

      i saw p value is negative in some rows, however, the adjusted p value seems okay. Is it normal, or do i have to specify more parameters?

      Thank you!

      Comment

      • Simon Anders
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2010
        • 995

        #4
        Negative p values are impossible. You must have either uncovered a very subtle bug, or have done something wrong. Post more details if the problem persists.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
          by SEQadmin2


          Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


          The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
          ...
          06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        12 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
        0 responses
        107 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
        0 responses
        125 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...