Tweet
Tophat/GSNAP: proper-paired reads
Hi Everyone,
I tried Tophat v 2.0.6 and GSNAP v 2013-02-05 to align Illumina paired-end reads. However, the numbers of proper-paired reads were very different. I also used cufflinks for assembly, but got similar number of genes/isoforms. Is there anything wrong with my commands? Why did Tophat result in such low proper-paired read rates? Thanks!
To get proper-paired reads:
samtools view -f 0x2 accepted_hits.bam | cut -f1 | sort | uniq | wc -l
Tophat comands:
>> tophat -G genes.gtf -o tophat --no-novel-juncs genome read_1 read_2
Results: 1,431,500 (6.34%) proper-paired reads; 3746 genes (cufflinks).
GSNAP command
>> gsnap -A sam -N 0 -D ~/Software/gmap-2013-02-05/ -d mm10 -s mm10.splicesites.iit read_1 read_2
Results: 20,543,759 (90.9%) proper-paired reads;3959 genes (cufflinks).
I tried Tophat v 2.0.6 and GSNAP v 2013-02-05 to align Illumina paired-end reads. However, the numbers of proper-paired reads were very different. I also used cufflinks for assembly, but got similar number of genes/isoforms. Is there anything wrong with my commands? Why did Tophat result in such low proper-paired read rates? Thanks!
To get proper-paired reads:
samtools view -f 0x2 accepted_hits.bam | cut -f1 | sort | uniq | wc -l
Tophat comands:
>> tophat -G genes.gtf -o tophat --no-novel-juncs genome read_1 read_2
Results: 1,431,500 (6.34%) proper-paired reads; 3746 genes (cufflinks).
GSNAP command
>> gsnap -A sam -N 0 -D ~/Software/gmap-2013-02-05/ -d mm10 -s mm10.splicesites.iit read_1 read_2
Results: 20,543,759 (90.9%) proper-paired reads;3959 genes (cufflinks).