Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • NicoBxl
    not just another member
    • Aug 2010
    • 264

    #1

    Biological and technical replicates in expression analysis (DESeq)

    Hi,

    I've to analyze several RNA-Seq samples. I've samples from several runs, unstraned and straned, and several samples sequenced multiple times ( using different library kit ). I used htseq-count to have the read counts and want now to use DESeq to check for differential expression. So I've biological replicates and technical replicates (same sample sequences several times using a different lib kit. Is that correct ?).

    So I did a design matrix. In my example, A.1 means sample A, sequencing 1. A.2 : sample A, sequencing 2,... So A is sequenced two times (One unstranded, one stranded), B three times (One unstranded, two stranded), C one time (one unstraned) and D one time (one stranded). ReplicateGroup is used to put together technical replicates.

    Code:
    designTable : 
    Sample      Condition  Stranded   ReplicateGroup
    A.1         Ctrl          No             A
    B.1         Treated       No             B
    C.1         Treated       No             C
    A.2         Ctrl          Yes            A
    B.2         Treated       Yes            B
    B.3         Treated       Yes            B
    D.1         Treated       Yes            D
    After that I use DESeq. countTable is the read count matrix.

    Code:
    cdsFull = newCountDataSet( countTable, designTable )
    cdsFull = estimateSizeFactors( cdsFull )
    cdsFull = estimateDispersions( cdsFull )
    But now I don't know how to fit a model o
    n "condition" "stranded" and "replicateGroup".

    like that ?

    Code:
    fit1 = fitNbinomGLMs( cdsFull, count ~ Condition + Stranded + ReplicateGroup )
    fit0 = fitNbinomGLMs( cdsFull, count ~ Condition )
    pvalsGLM = nbinomGLMTest( fit1, fit0 )
    padjGLM = p.adjust( pvalsGLM, method="BH" )
    Is it the good way to analyze technical replicated. I read that I have to merge them together.. but I don't think it's a good idea due to the fact that I use different library kits. So I'm stuck...

    Thanks a lot in advance

    N.

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • SEQadmin2
    16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
    by SEQadmin2




    NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
    Yesterday, 06:46 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
    by SEQadmin2



    Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

    Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
    ...
    10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
0 responses
29 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
0 responses
71 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
0 responses
48 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...