Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • thinkRNA
    Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 94

    #16
    Hi Jay, thanks for getting back to me so quickly. I have certainly thought about PCR duplicates being the source of variation as we did PCR amplify before sequencing. The problem is my data is single end Illumina data and I don't know how to differentiate whether a duplicate read is a result of PCR amplification or a genuine indication of a copy of the mRNA. I think if I had paired end reads, I could use the size distribution of the library to eliminate PCR duplicates. I can perhaps apply the assumption of the library size to single end reads too, but I need to think more about this? If any one has other ideas on how to detect PCR duplicates in RNA seq data, please let me know.

    Also, I am probably missing something but since you didn't find anything with free energy, how are you convinced that RNA sec structure interfering with the transcriptase could be a source? Are you thinking the algorithm for detecting free energy is not efficient? if the RNA is sheared before creating the cDNA, I think it should eliminate sec structure formations (though I could be wrong).
    Finally, this is a stupid question, at what step is the GC coverage variation introduced?

    Comment

    • thinkRNA
      Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 94

      #17
      I guess you don't need to answer the last stupid question as I found a paper that explains it really well.
      http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/co...ull/36/16/e105

      Comment

      • jay
        Member
        • Feb 2009
        • 12

        #18
        I didn't get anywhere with free energy, possibly because of the sequence we are using - a 10kb RNA genome - I found tools which would predict its shape, and that would predict free energy for shorter sequences, but I couldn't find a tool quickly online that would give me a free energy estimate per base for such a long sequence, so I gave up after a day or so of looking, as we were not interested in quantification per se. If you have any ideas of a good tool for this I'd definitely be interested to give it a go. You may be right about shearing controlling for sec structures, I will talk to our experimentalist about this, as his thought was that secondary structure would be an issue.

        Comment

        • thinkRNA
          Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 94

          #19
          have you tried mfold?


          I haven't used it but a colleague says its the one of the best out there.
          EDIT: it takes max 1500 bases, so I guess you'll have to chop you RNA sequence (!)
          Last edited by thinkRNA; 08-11-2010, 09:01 AM.

          Comment

          • Xi Wang
            Senior Member
            • Oct 2009
            • 317

            #20
            There are two papers studying on RNA-seq biases:
            Modeling non-uniformity in short-read rates in RNA-Seq data. Genome Biology.
            Biases in Illumina transcriptome sequencing caused by random hexamer priming. NAR.

            They may help you on this topic.
            Xi Wang

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            25 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            36 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...