Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dbroh11
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 8

    Experimental Design Given One Cell Line

    We are interested in examining the effects of four different drug compounds (with 1 being a "control" in the form of a growth factor) on differential gene expression in a motor neuron cell line.

    We are planning to split the same motor neuron cell culture into 3 separate dishes for all 4 drug exposure conditions (12 total dishes per experiment). We would then isolate RNA from all three dishes per drug, combine it and add a single unique barcode during the Total Stranded RNA-Seq prep for Illumina sequencing.

    After reading many Anders posts, I see the inherent problem if we were to only test 4 total barcoded samples against each other (even though each is being comprised of RNA from different treated cell cultures) as ultimately it is one replicate per condition.

    While biological replicates aren't possible in this case since it is one cell line being tested across conditions, would the solution then be to repeat this experimental design at three different time points, and then run the 12 barcoded samples (each representing aggregate RNA from three split cell cultures to a given drug response at one of the three time points)? Can we run the RNA-Seq analyses (either Tuxedo Suite or DESeq workflow) treating these as if they were biological replicates even though they are not?

    i.e - Drug 1 - 3 barcoded samples (made from aggregate RNA from 9 total separate plates) from time point 1, 2, and 3... and same for Drug 2, 3, and 4?

    Thanks!

    Dave Brohawn
  • bruce01
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 160

    #2
    I am having to design multiple cell line experiments having never done so before and have similar issues. I don't know much about cell culture but wanted to answer you with our strategy, maybe someone else has more to add.

    I am not sure about your strategy of combining RNA from 3 replicates, it never seems like a good idea to combine individual extractions. My approach would be to use these as biological replicates, despite being cell lines I still view them as being distinct entities, and there will be some difference in expression between them, even in controls, possibly based on sequence error. However I expect the treated cells to cluster very closely in PCA plot or such.

    The problem then becomes "how many replicates". Recent paper answers this reasonably well, and in the expected manner: "how many replicates can you afford?".

    Comment

    • mbblack
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 245

      #3
      Have a look at this statisticians discussion of replication with cell lines (since yes, conventional "biological" replication is not truly possible) - http://labstats.net/articles/cell_culture_n.html (see the "design 3 setup).

      One thing I would suggest is a set of strictly vehicle controls, as well as your growth factor. It is always good to have a measure of "untreated" background expression.
      Michael Black, Ph.D.
      ScitoVation LLC. RTP, N.C.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
        by SEQadmin2



        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
        ...
        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
        by SEQadmin2



        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
      0 responses
      24 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
      0 responses
      33 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
      0 responses
      21 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
      0 responses
      34 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...