Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • HNK
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2014
    • 1

    Rpkm deg

    Hi Everyone,
    I am working on a set of samples (generated using Illumina) for differential gene expression between control and treated samples. I performed pre processing using few tools, used mapping tool and did the feature counting. Now i have a single txt file having gene names and counts for all samples. i have few questions.

    1)To make tag counts comparable in samples, a normalization must be performed. i have been asked by my supervior to se RPKM. (RPKM (reads per kilobase per million) is a method of normalization that is widely used in RNA-seq analysis). Do i have to First filter all the genes that is zero across all the samples and then normalize. If yes, can anyone tell me how to normalize my file using RPKM by just giving my feature count txt file as input. (any bioconductor, R, python package).

    2) Once i have the normalized file, using RPKM, i would like to find out differentially expressed genes. How should i do that.

    I know , DESeq and edgeR packages differ in their default normalization: edgeR uses the trimmed mean of M values56, whereas DESeq uses a relative log expression approach. But i am interested in RPKM(as per requirement).

Latest Articles

Collapse

  • GATTACAT
    Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by GATTACAT
    Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
    07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
  • SEQadmin2
    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
    by SEQadmin2


    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
    06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

ad_right_rmr

Collapse

News

Collapse

Topics Statistics Last Post
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
0 responses
23 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
0 responses
55 views
0 reactions
Last Post SEQadmin2  
Working...