Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • chariko
    Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 56

    #1

    Strange results Deseq2 no adjusted p values or even p values

    I analyzed a RNASeq experiment with EDGE-Pro and the statistical test was performed with Deseq2.
    I obtained the following strange results for the statistical test for some genes (info regarding the number of counts for each sample is added):

    -----; Fold Change; pvalue; padj; CONDITION_1; CONDITION_1; CONDITION_1; CONDITION_2; CONDITION_2; CONDITION_2
    Gene1; -5.2; 0.003; NA; 0; 2; 0; 4; 5; 26
    Gene2; -5.16; 0.004; NA; 2; 0; 0; 4; 4; 18
    Gene3; -3.21; 0.019; NA; 5; 2; 2; 22; 3; 15
    Gene4; -3.64; 0.024; NA; 1; 4; 1; 3; 5; 38
    Gene5; -3.21; 0.031; NA; 8; 8; 5; 2; 2; 0
    Gene6; 1.01; NA; NA; 786; 65; 42; 228; 119; 281
    Gene7; -8.18; NA; NA; 5; 2; 4; 8; 6; 326
    Gene8; -30.19; NA; NA; 16; 20; 0; 502; 415; 1192


    My questions are:

    1) Does anybody know why I do not obtain any padj value for any of the genes?
    I wondered it was because for the presence of "0" but that does not match for all the cases (gene 3 and gene 4)

    2) Why do I not obtain any p value for Gene 7 and 8? They have a high variability but in any case I supposse that would not affect the statistical test (at least the could have obtained a P=1)

    Any clues would be appreciated,
  • mbblack
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 245

    #2
    chariko - have a look through this thread as it should already give you the answer to your question - http://seqanswers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=45526
    Michael Black, Ph.D.
    ScitoVation LLC. RTP, N.C.

    Comment

    • chariko
      Member
      • Jun 2010
      • 56

      #3
      Thanks a lot for your answer, mbblack. You are right, that was my case.

      Comment

      • Michael Love
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2013
        • 333

        #4
        hi, you can also check the FAQ of the DESeq2 vignette:

        vignette("DESeq2")

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
          by SEQadmin2




          NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification, detection...
          Today, 06:46 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:51 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        68 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        48 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...