Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • anj_1
    Junior Member
    • May 2014
    • 6

    differential expression (DE)

    Hi,

    I am trying to compare results between isoform and gene level DE for a set of genes to figure out if any of the genes were affected by splicing. Any suggestions on how to do this?
  • blancha
    Senior Member
    • May 2013
    • 367

    #2
    I'm not sure I understand your question very clearly.
    If you are trying to determine differential splicing between conditions, there are multiple programs that will attempt to do this, as a quick Google search will show.

    Here are just a few of the programs the will do a differential splicing analysis.
    Each program has its specific strengths and weaknesses.
    MATS, Cuffdiff, DEXSeq, MISO, ...

    Comment

    • anj_1
      Junior Member
      • May 2014
      • 6

      #3
      so what i meant is:

      i have genes_exp.diff
      isoform_exp.diff

      Both generated from Cuffdiff. I want to compare results between isoform and gene level DE to identify any genes that may be affected by splicing.

      How would I go about doing this?

      Comment

      • blancha
        Senior Member
        • May 2013
        • 367

        #4
        If you want to analyze splicing with Cuffdiff, you would want to look at the file "splicing.diff".
        Generally, the results of the splicing analysis by Cuffdiff are useless though.
        Few, if any significant results, ...
        I generally don't even bother looking at it, but I have seen some papers reporting the results of splicing.diff.

        You're much better off analyzing splicing using a different software.
        I really like MATS.
        It's very simple to understand the underlying principle, based on comparing the counts for reads overlapping junctions.

        For a specific junction, you can also visually determine differential splicing by generating Sashimi plots with IGV after loading the BAM files.
        This is my also one of my favourite methods for determining differential splicing for specific junctions.

        Be warned that researchers unfamiliar with RNA-Seq invariably will complain about the results of the differential splicing analysis. Detecting a differential splicing event is dependent on the sequencing depth at the splicing site, and how great the differences in splicing are. If the depth is low at the splicing site, or the differences in splicing are small, you will not be able to detect them. To detect differential splicing, using in my opinion the most reliable method, you need a significant difference between the conditions being compared in the reads spanning the junction.
        Last edited by blancha; 11-16-2015, 07:34 PM.

        Comment

        • anj_1
          Junior Member
          • May 2014
          • 6

          #5
          thank you Blancha!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
            by SEQadmin2


            Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


            The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
            ...
            06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
          0 responses
          39 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
          0 responses
          102 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
          0 responses
          123 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
          0 responses
          114 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...