Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sebastian_Quezada_R
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2016
    • 8

    De novo transcriptome assembly using Trinity but for single-end reads?

    Hi everyone =)

    A colleague of mine advised me to create a de novo transcriptome assembly for my reads in sheep (because sheep annotations suck) but we couldn't find a way on the internet to do it for single-end reads. All of them were for paired-end and started by aligning Fw and Rv reads, so we're not quite sure how we should do it.

    Have you done it before?

    Cheers,

    Seb.
    Last edited by Sebastian_Quezada_R; 08-29-2016, 08:34 PM.
  • gringer
    David Eccles (gringer)
    • May 2011
    • 845

    #2
    Trinity will work with single-end reads (use argument '--single'), it's just a bit better with paired-end, and even better with stranded reads. Paired ends can help to resolve different isoforms, and there are some instances where transcripts can overlap on opposite strands.

    Comment

    • kmcarr
      Senior Member
      • May 2008
      • 1181

      #3
      Before going to the trouble of doing your own transcriptome assembly I'd test just how much the current annotations suck. The most recent Ensembl genebuild for sheep has ~21,000 coding genes and ~6,000 non coding. Map your read data to the genome and see what percentage of your reads map within annotated genes. Also, since a genome sequence exists you may consider using a reference guided transcriptome assembly instead of de novo.

      Comment

      • Sebastian_Quezada_R
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2016
        • 8

        #4
        Originally posted by gringer View Post
        Trinity will work with single-end reads (use argument '--single'), it's just a bit better with paired-end, and even better with stranded reads. Paired ends can help to resolve different isoforms, and there are some instances where transcripts can overlap on opposite strands.
        Thanks =) That worked awesome

        Originally posted by kmcarr View Post
        Before going to the trouble of doing your own transcriptome assembly I'd test just how much the current annotations suck. The most recent Ensembl genebuild for sheep has ~21,000 coding genes and ~6,000 non coding. Map your read data to the genome and see what percentage of your reads map within annotated genes. Also, since a genome sequence exists you may consider using a reference guided transcriptome assembly instead of de novo.
        Which program would you recommend to be the best for that? I might do the reference guided transcriptome assembly afterwards if this doesn't work out.

        Thanks in advance!

        Comment

        • gringer
          David Eccles (gringer)
          • May 2011
          • 845

          #5
          Reference-guided Trinity for sheep should be fine (see here), and would improve your transcriptome assembly. The main issue with that is that you won't see any reads that aren't supported by the genome, but the sheep assembly should be comprehensive enough that you shouldn't have any problems. At least, that's the impression I got from James Kijas today when he was talking about it at QRW.

          Comment

          • Sebastian_Quezada_R
            Junior Member
            • Aug 2016
            • 8

            #6
            Originally posted by gringer View Post
            Reference-guided Trinity for sheep should be fine (see here), and would improve your transcriptome assembly. The main issue with that is that you won't see any reads that aren't supported by the genome, but the sheep assembly should be comprehensive enough that you shouldn't have any problems. At least, that's the impression I got from James Kijas today when he was talking about it at QRW.
            Thanks for that =)!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              Yesterday, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
              by SEQadmin2


              Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


              The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
              ...
              06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            9 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            18 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            52 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
            0 responses
            110 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...