Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sebastian_Quezada_R
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2016
    • 8

    #1

    De novo transcriptome assembly using Trinity but for single-end reads?

    Hi everyone =)

    A colleague of mine advised me to create a de novo transcriptome assembly for my reads in sheep (because sheep annotations suck) but we couldn't find a way on the internet to do it for single-end reads. All of them were for paired-end and started by aligning Fw and Rv reads, so we're not quite sure how we should do it.

    Have you done it before?

    Cheers,

    Seb.
    Last edited by Sebastian_Quezada_R; 08-29-2016, 08:34 PM.
  • gringer
    David Eccles (gringer)
    • May 2011
    • 845

    #2
    Trinity will work with single-end reads (use argument '--single'), it's just a bit better with paired-end, and even better with stranded reads. Paired ends can help to resolve different isoforms, and there are some instances where transcripts can overlap on opposite strands.

    Comment

    • kmcarr
      Senior Member
      • May 2008
      • 1181

      #3
      Before going to the trouble of doing your own transcriptome assembly I'd test just how much the current annotations suck. The most recent Ensembl genebuild for sheep has ~21,000 coding genes and ~6,000 non coding. Map your read data to the genome and see what percentage of your reads map within annotated genes. Also, since a genome sequence exists you may consider using a reference guided transcriptome assembly instead of de novo.

      Comment

      • Sebastian_Quezada_R
        Junior Member
        • Aug 2016
        • 8

        #4
        Originally posted by gringer View Post
        Trinity will work with single-end reads (use argument '--single'), it's just a bit better with paired-end, and even better with stranded reads. Paired ends can help to resolve different isoforms, and there are some instances where transcripts can overlap on opposite strands.
        Thanks =) That worked awesome

        Originally posted by kmcarr View Post
        Before going to the trouble of doing your own transcriptome assembly I'd test just how much the current annotations suck. The most recent Ensembl genebuild for sheep has ~21,000 coding genes and ~6,000 non coding. Map your read data to the genome and see what percentage of your reads map within annotated genes. Also, since a genome sequence exists you may consider using a reference guided transcriptome assembly instead of de novo.
        Which program would you recommend to be the best for that? I might do the reference guided transcriptome assembly afterwards if this doesn't work out.

        Thanks in advance!

        Comment

        • gringer
          David Eccles (gringer)
          • May 2011
          • 845

          #5
          Reference-guided Trinity for sheep should be fine (see here), and would improve your transcriptome assembly. The main issue with that is that you won't see any reads that aren't supported by the genome, but the sheep assembly should be comprehensive enough that you shouldn't have any problems. At least, that's the impression I got from James Kijas today when he was talking about it at QRW.

          Comment

          • Sebastian_Quezada_R
            Junior Member
            • Aug 2016
            • 8

            #6
            Originally posted by gringer View Post
            Reference-guided Trinity for sheep should be fine (see here), and would improve your transcriptome assembly. The main issue with that is that you won't see any reads that aren't supported by the genome, but the sheep assembly should be comprehensive enough that you shouldn't have any problems. At least, that's the impression I got from James Kijas today when he was talking about it at QRW.
            Thanks for that =)!

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              16S/ITS Profiling vs. Shotgun Metagenomics: What Changes in Your Workflow?
              by SEQadmin2





              NGS has revolutionized clinical microbiology by offering new ways to identify and surveil pathogens without prior knowledge of the target. One popular approach is 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, which targets specific microbial markers. But studies are increasingly incorporating shotgun metagenomics, a technique that sequences all DNA from a sample without targeting specific microbial markers. This approach allows more detailed taxonomic classification,...
              10-30-2026, 06:46 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 07:59 AM
            0 responses
            13 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-05-2026, 09:25 AM
            0 responses
            32 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 11-03-2026, 11:54 AM
            0 responses
            45 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-28-2026, 09:57 AM
            0 responses
            170 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...