Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • edwardwong1070584
    Junior Member
    • Aug 2016
    • 5

    Transcriptome sequencing

    Dear all,

    I have a naive question. I would like to do transcriptome sequencing using human total rna as sample. I need to calculate the read depth with this formula: Coverage= (read length*number of reads)/genome size. We all know the human genome size is approximately 3 billions. But do we know the size of the total rna? Am I even asking the right question? Your kind advice would be very much appreciated.

    Thank you.
    Ed
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    That's not a meaningful metric in RNAseq, for the reason you mentioned and the fact that even if the exact transcriptome size of a particular cell type were known you'd want enough reads to properly handle the dynamic range in expression levels, rather than caring about an average level.

    Comment

    • edwardwong1070584
      Junior Member
      • Aug 2016
      • 5

      #3
      Originally posted by dpryan View Post
      That's not a meaningful metric in RNAseq, for the reason you mentioned and the fact that even if the exact transcriptome size of a particular cell type were known you'd want enough reads to properly handle the dynamic range in expression levels, rather than caring about an average level.
      Thanks Dpryan for your reply. So let me to get it right, in your opinions, you would rather to look at the number of reads/ sample from a run than the coverage depth as we commonly look at when dealing with transcriptome sequencing? Actually, I had a similar thought as you. I was taught that the number of reads is important when handling the RNAse, but, I was confused when my PI wanted me to do a transcriptome sequencing on human total RNA to generate a 30-50millions reads and read depth of 50x. I have no issue with the number of reads but I was confused with the read depth. How should I calculate the depth? Can I use the normal human genome size (~3billions) for it?

      Thanks again for the advice
      Ed

      Comment

      • dpryan
        Devon Ryan
        • Jul 2011
        • 3478

        #4
        Just ignore the "50x" part, there's no worthwhile way to calculate it (if your PI complains, just send him/her here to ask).

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        27 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        37 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        34 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...