Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • icanwinwyz
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2016
    • 8

    #1

    Independent filtering by using fold change in DESeq2

    Hi everyone,
    Thanks for reading my post.

    I know DESeq2 uses normalized mean count as independent filtering to improve the performance of multiple testing error correction. I would like to know is it possible I can add the criteria, |log2FC| > 1, together with normalized mean count as the independent filtering? If so, how could I add this criteria? by using "filter=" or "filterFun=" argument? How to write the command?

    What I know now is to change the "lfcThreshold=" to 1, but this only change the null hypothesis from 0 to 1, not actually filter any genes.

    Many Thanks in advance!
  • dpryan
    Devon Ryan
    • Jul 2011
    • 3478

    #2
    No you can't use fold-change in independent filtering, it wouldn't then be independent. You can filter genes after the fact for the fold-change threshold you want.

    Comment

    • icanwinwyz
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2016
      • 8

      #3
      Originally posted by dpryan View Post
      No you can't use fold-change in independent filtering, it wouldn't then be independent. You can filter genes after the fact for the fold-change threshold you want.
      Hi dpryan,
      Thanks for your reply. You mean I should run DESeq for DE analysis first and then filter out the genes with small fold change? If so, could I only perform multiple testing error correction for those genes remained instead of all the genes tested? Since this would give me more significant DE genes with big fold change.

      Thanks.

      Comment

      • wdecoster
        Member
        • Oct 2015
        • 97

        #4
        But that is a violation of independent filtering principle, you cannot filter for something you are testing for. Obviously it is great for your p-values, but also completely invalid and should be considered p-value-hacking.

        Comment

        • icanwinwyz
          Junior Member
          • Feb 2016
          • 8

          #5
          Originally posted by wdecoster View Post
          But that is a violation of independent filtering principle, you cannot filter for something you are testing for. Obviously it is great for your p-values, but also completely invalid and should be considered p-value-hacking.
          Hi wdecoster,
          Thanks for you reply.
          So nothing we can do by using fold change to filter the genes? any suggestion? Thanks

          Comment

          • dpryan
            Devon Ryan
            • Jul 2011
            • 3478

            #6
            You can filter genes by fold-change after calculating p-values and adjusting for multiple testing. If you do anything like that beforehand odds are good that you'll end up with me as a reviewer and I will guarantee that your paper is rejected.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            17 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...