Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • zun
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 26

    #1

    How to decide FPKM fo known genes

    Hi , everyone.

    I am wondering how I should determin the FPKM of reference genes.

    I can get FPKM of cufflinks predicted transcript from cuffsompare output(transcript.tmap).

    like this..
    ref_gene_id ref_id class_code cuff_gene_id cuff_id FMI FPKM FPKM_conf_lo FPKM_conf_hi cov len major_iso_id
    AT1G01020 AT1G01020.1 e CUFF.1 CUFF.1.1 100 0.823930 0.000000 1.989144 1.195219 251 CUFF.1.1
    AT1G01030 AT1G01030.1 p CUFF.3 CUFF.3.1 100 2.209471 0.233260 4.185682 2.136752 234 CUFF.3.1
    AT1G01030 AT1G01030.1 c CUFF.5 CUFF.5.1 100 7.940817 5.599198 10.282437 8.514190 599 CUFF.5.1
    AT1G01020 AT1G01020.1 c CUFF.8 CUFF.8.1 100 9.703712 5.618407 13.789018 10.301606 846 CUFF.8.1
    AT1G01020 AT1G01020.2 j CUFF.8 CUFF.8.2 51 4.949442 1.006100 8.892785 5.254402 816 CUFF.8.1

    But, in case that ref_gene_id appers many times(for example, AT1G01030),
    how can I calculate FPKM of that ref_gene_id??

    Or,are there different ways to know FPKM of know genes from RNA-seq??

    Please help me!!
  • dariober
    Senior Member
    • May 2010
    • 311

    #2
    Hi Zun,

    I guess to get the FPKM of reference genes you can run cufflinks with the relevant GTF file without the need of cuffcompare (if you have reference genes you should be able to download or create the GTF file). Cufflinks will look into the gtf file and determine the FPKM of each gene/transcript without assembling new ones. That is, if you run something like:
    Code:
    cufflinks accepted_hits.sam -G yourgtffile.gtf  [other options...]
    You should get a file called transcripts.expr that looks like this:
    Code:
    trans_id	bundle_id	chr	left	right	FPKM	FMI	frac	FPKM_conf_lo	FPKM_conf_hi	coverage	length
    ENSSSCT00000004429	303522	1	349787	389816	2.73911	1	1	2.013	3.46522	1.29032	1544
    ENSSSCT00000004430	303526	1	390644	391199	1.1352	1	1	0.355534	1.91487	0.534763	555
    ENSSSCT00000004431	303530	1	399818	708754	0.0708618	1	1	0	0.160517	0.0556351	2620
    ...
    Is it what you need?

    Hope it helps!

    Comment

    • zun
      Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 26

      #3
      Thanks!

      Hi, dariober!

      That's exactry what I want!!
      Thanks a lot !!

      But, the number of genes are different between reference and output...

      reference extracted ID only)
      ID=Os01t0100100-01;Name=Os01t0100100-01;GO=Molecular
      ID=Os01t0100200-01;Name=Os01t0100200-01;Alias=AK059894;ID_converter=Os01g0100200;Locus_id=Os01g0100200;NIAS_FLcDNA=006-208-E01;Note=Conserved
      ID=Os01t0100400-01;Name=Os01t0100400-01;Alias=AK101455;GO=Molecular
      ID=Os01t0100500-01;Name=Os01t0100500-01;Alias=AK067316;ID_converter=Os01g0100500;Link_to=Gene
      gene.expr
      gene_id bundle_id chr left right FPKM FPKM_conf_lo FPKM_conf_hi
      Os01t0100100-01 48157 chr01 1982 9815 14.5909 12.9796 16.2022
      Os01t0100400-01 48157 chr01 11720 14685 4.77297 3.69897 5.84697
      Os01t0100500-01 48157 chr01 15398 19144 1.9978 1.31256 2.68303
      The gene whose ID is Os01t0100200-01 is not in gene.expr...
      This time , I used reference gene gtf file of Chr01 just to know how it would work.

      cufflinks accept_hist.sam -G reference_gene_chr01.gtf
      The number of reference gene was 5928,but output was reduced to 3848...
      Why did cufflinks avoid some genes??
      Last edited by zun; 12-01-2010, 05:43 PM.

      Comment

      • dariober
        Senior Member
        • May 2010
        • 311

        #4
        Hi Zun,

        Originally posted by zun View Post
        Hi, dariober!

        That's exactry what I want!!
        Thanks a lot !!
        Glad to hear that!

        The number of reference gene was 5928,but output was reduced to 3848...
        Why did cufflinks avoid some genes??
        I'm pretty sure that cufflinks doesn't report in output those genes that are not expressed at all. 3848 expressed genes out of 5928 sounds about right, although I know nothing about your experiment.
        (This might be trivial to say but... Also, make sure you are counting in the gft file the features that cufflinks uses as reference.)

        Dario

        Comment

        • zun
          Member
          • Oct 2010
          • 26

          #5
          I got it!

          Hi, dariober
          I appreciate your prompt reply!

          I'm pretty sure that cufflinks doesn't report in output those genes that are not expressed at all. 3848 expressed genes out of 5928 sounds about right, although I know nothing about your experiment.
          (This might be trivial to say but... Also, make sure you are counting in the gft file the features that cufflinks uses as reference.)
          I see! I made sure that the reads were not mapped on the Os01t0100200-01 gene at all.
          I am just a infomatician for a wet experiment, so I don't know the condition of this RNA-seq. But, I want to make sure whether many cuffcompare predicted genes really express or not!

          I hope your work will do well ,too!
          THANKS!

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
            by SEQadmin2



            CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

            Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
            ...
            07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
            by SEQadmin2


            Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

            The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
            ...
            07-20-2026, 11:48 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
            by SEQadmin2



            Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
            ...
            07-09-2026, 11:10 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 07:41 AM
          0 responses
          12 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
          0 responses
          38 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-24-2026, 12:17 PM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...