Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • BGould
    Member
    • May 2010
    • 14

    #1

    Interspecies alignment and read length comparison?

    I am planing on aligning RNASeq reads from a nonmodel plant to a model plant genome. Does anyone have experience with (or know of any great references) comparing the amount of alignment using short (~50bp) reads vs. long reads(~100bp) and the quality of those alignments when aligning to non conspecific reference genomes ?
  • chadn737
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 392

    #2
    I have no experience with this, but I would venture to guess that you would get better alignment using shorter read lengths. The longer the read, the more differences you would have between the read sequence and the reference sequence which would likely result in poorer mapping.

    I am curious though, why align to a model plant? I would think that a large percentage of your reads will fail to align. Why not do a de-novo assembly of the transcriptome and compare this to your model plant? Like I said, I have no experience with this because all my work is done on Arabidopsis, which is well annotated.

    Comment

    • lh3
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 686

      #3
      Longer reads are almost always better for alignment. Nonetheless, I agree that de novo assembly would be preferred.

      Comment

      • chadn737
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 392

        #4
        Originally posted by lh3 View Post
        Longer reads are almost always better for alignment. Nonetheless, I agree that de novo assembly would be preferred.
        Certainly long reads are better, especially if your reads are from the same organism whose genome you are aligning to. They would also be better for de novo assembly. Which I think is probably the preferred method here, but I'm not sure what BGould wants to do with their data.

        However, if for some reason, you were wanting to align reads from a different organism to a model organism (without de novo assembly), I think it would be harder to align longer reads because the longer the read, the more sequence difference there will be between the read and the genome you are aligning to. Your aligner would have to allow for more mismatches between the read and reference. Otherwise, a large number of your reads would not be aligned. As an illustration, say you have two orthologs, one from the model organism that you are aligning to and one in the non-model organism, the source of your reads. Say that there is a difference in the sequence every 25 or 50 bps. The longer the read is, the more of these differences there will be in a read. Unless you really played with the settings of a lot of aligners, I would think that this would result in a large number of reads failing to align.

        Somebody correct me if my reasoning is wrong. I find this an interesting scenario and would be curious what the best approach is.

        Comment

        • lh3
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2008
          • 686

          #5
          Nothing prevents you from doing local alignment.

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • SEQadmin2
            Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
            by SEQadmin2



            Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

            Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
            ...
            Today, 09:55 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
            by SEQadmin2


            Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

            We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
            ...
            09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 05:39 AM
          0 responses
          9 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 09:56 AM
          0 responses
          11 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 09-29-2026, 09:51 AM
          0 responses
          76 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...