Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cli
    Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 29

    EpiSonic

    Dear all,

    Has anyone tried EpiSonic to shear genomic DNA? My goal is to shear DNA into 150bp - 200bp range. This equipment is much cheaper than Covaris. It also seems that you can use regular tube for shearing with EpiSonic?

    Thanks in advance.
  • protist
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 101

    #2
    Originally posted by cli View Post
    Dear all,

    Has anyone tried EpiSonic to shear genomic DNA? My goal is to shear DNA into 150bp - 200bp range. This equipment is much cheaper than Covaris. It also seems that you can use regular tube for shearing with EpiSonic?

    Thanks in advance.
    I have not used that particular instrument but it appears similar to the Biorupter from Diagenode (except EpiSonic supports multiwell plates). We use our Biorupter for fragmentation of all genomic or ChIP DNA samples. The fact that Biorupter was was substantially cheaper than Covaris was a factor when we purchased it.....

    Comment

    • cli
      Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 29

      #3
      Thanks for your reply. The price of Covaris is also my major concern. EpiSonic Multi-Functional Bioprocessor 1000 is only priced for $1,1950. The gel picture of sheared products look good according to their website. How do you like your result from biorupter? I like to save some money but also want make sure nothing compromise the results. Thanks.
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • protist
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2009
        • 101

        #4
        We have had no problems with the Biorupter and we have been using it since late 2008. I have made lots of gDNA libraries with varying insert sizes with no problems. We have also used it for both ChIPseq and FAIRE-seq libraries. The tube format is both convenient and stops any cross contamination. The multiwell plate format with the EpiSonic looks very interesting as that would allow a higher throughput. My advice would be to ask for a demo if possible and try it out on some of your samples but from the information it looks as if it should do the job.

        Comment

        • cli
          Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 29

          #5
          Yes, I will ask for a demo. Thanks for your suggestion.

          Comment

          • darwin142
            Junior Member
            • May 2011
            • 3

            #6
            Hi Cli,
            Did you ever request a demo?

            Comment

            • cli
              Member
              • Mar 2011
              • 29

              #7
              I did online, but no one replied me yet. I will call them up. I keep you updated about what I find out.

              Comment

              • Paolo oxford
                Junior Member
                • Nov 2011
                • 2

                #8
                episonic trial

                Hi we have tested the episonic instrument and are quite happy. not 100% consistent across a 96 well plate but we fragment 1 plate for genomic in less than 10min (after chilling the horn)!

                Comment

                • ETHANol
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2010
                  • 308

                  #9
                  I haven't used the EpiSonic but lately I've been using the Covaris for shearing x-linked DNA for ChIP. I've been very impressed with the following:

                  1) Reproducibility is amazing even between different cell types, tissues and cells concentrations.
                  2) Even shearing of DNA with very little bias towards regions of open chromatin which was an issue using a tip sonicator.
                  3) Efficiently shears x-linked DNA in 0.1% SDS so no dilution of sample is necessary before immunoprecipitation.
                  4) Very little epitope degradation.

                  I have seen some data provided from Covaris that shows the Bioruptor causes more epitope degradation but it wasn't a perfectly controlled experiment.

                  Anyway if anyone has data addressing these points that compares the EpiSonic/Bioruptor with the Covaris I would like to see it. As is I think we are going to go ahead and purchase the Covaris. While an expensive instrument, given the price of the equipment and reagents associated with next-gen sequencing it looks like a good investment.
                  --------------
                  Ethan

                  Comment

                  Latest Articles

                  Collapse

                  • SEQadmin2
                    Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                    by SEQadmin2


                    I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


                    Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                    Today, 07:11 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                    by SEQadmin2


                    Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                    The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                    ...
                    06-02-2026, 10:05 AM
                  • SEQadmin2
                    Single-Cell Sequencing at an Inflection Point: Early Impacts of New Platforms and Emerging Trends
                    by SEQadmin2


                    With the launch of new single-cell sequencing platforms in 2026, the field stands at an exciting inflection point. This article surveys the most impactful advances in the field and discusses how they’re reshaping research in cancer, immunology, and beyond.


                    Introduction

                    Single-cell sequencing technologies have undergone remarkable advances over the past decade, transitioning from low-throughput experimental approaches to highly scalable platforms capable of...
                    05-22-2026, 06:42 AM

                  ad_right_rmr

                  Collapse

                  News

                  Collapse

                  Topics Statistics Last Post
                  Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 06:09 AM
                  0 responses
                  16 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                  0 responses
                  37 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                  0 responses
                  42 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
                  0 responses
                  49 views
                  0 reactions
                  Last Post SEQadmin2  
                  Working...