Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dobbr493
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2011
    • 5

    #1

    mRNA on Bioanalyser

    Hi there

    We are looking at doing a transcriptome experiment with very limited starting material (usually around 10ug total RNA of good quality RIN > 8). We have tried both the Roche magnetic bead kit and Ambion spin column kit for extracting mRNA from total RNA and are unsure as to what the mRNA should look like on the Agilent Bioanalyser. An example of what we have been seeing is attached - is this mRNA or just rubbish?

    Cheers
    Attached Files
  • RCJK
    Senior Member
    • May 2009
    • 156

    #2
    I'd say that's just rubbish. What does the ladder lane look like? Did you run any blank lanes to see if the noisy baseline flattens out?

    Comment

    • RCJK
      Senior Member
      • May 2009
      • 156

      #3
      Also, after those kits, are your samples in a buffer that is compatible with the Bioanalyser assay you are running?

      Comment

      • mnkyboy
        Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 87

        #4
        mRNA should look like an evenly distributed mound without the ribosomal peaks (I cant find an image easily). What you are showing is noise and either you concentration is too low (or there is nothing there) and/or your buffer is incompatible. You can see that type of result if your salt concentration is too high.

        Comment

        • dobbr493
          Junior Member
          • Jun 2011
          • 5

          #5
          I was wondering what kind of quantities of total RNA have people used for extracting mRNA from? At our lower limits, we have 5ug, max usually 10ug. Is this a common amount to be using with success?

          Also, having had trouble with the purification of mRNA we are now looking at amplifying it to get the quantity we need. Has anyone done this with success from the quantities of total RNA above? Any comment on the potential bias introduced with the PCR and selection steps in terms of NGS results would be appreciated.

          Thanks!

          Comment

          • pmiguel
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 2328

            #6
            Yes that is just background noise. Your nano chip is not sensitive enough to detect your mRNA. You could run your mRNA undiluted on a RNA Pico chip that might pick something up. Or you could check fluorometrically (with a single stranded fluor) to get an idea of what your mRNA concentration is.

            Maybe you have less total RNA to start with than you think? For the Nano chip you ran on the total RNA, what was the chip estimate of the concentration of your total RNA concentration? One common issue with estimating total RNA amounts is that even tiny amounts (1 ul per ml) of phenol will give you very strong readings at 260 nm, even in the absence of any nucleic acids.

            --
            Phillip

            Comment

            • shurjo
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2009
              • 132

              #7
              I'm attaching a picture from poly(A)-selected mRNA (from 10ug of total RNA) run on a Pico Chip. As you can see, the ribosomal molecules are still noticeably present, but then those are very hard to remove completely.
              Attached Files

              Comment

              • sisch
                Member
                • Jun 2011
                • 29

                #8
                Originally posted by mnkyboy View Post
                mRNA should look like an evenly distributed mound without the ribosomal peaks (I cant find an image easily). What you are showing is noise and either you concentration is too low (or there is nothing there) and/or your buffer is incompatible. You can see that type of result if your salt concentration is too high.
                Find attached one of our result files. To the left is totalRNA and to the right is purified mRNA with 1&2 being Qiagen Oligotex Kit purified (Pain in the ass imho) 3&4 Invitrogen Dynabeads.
                So that's what we believe mRNA should look like on a Bioanalyzer (up to 8% of residual rRNA rendered no problem in our experiments)

                By the way, we usually start off with 30 - 70ug totalRNA and have 0.5ug mRNA afterwards. The limit for sequencing w/o amplification is to my knowledge about 200ng mRNA.

                Cheers,
                Simon
                Attached Files
                Last edited by sisch; 07-08-2011, 07:53 AM.

                Comment

                • dobbr493
                  Junior Member
                  • Jun 2011
                  • 5

                  #9
                  Originally posted by shurjo View Post
                  I'm attaching a picture from poly(A)-selected mRNA (from 10ug of total RNA) run on a Pico Chip. As you can see, the ribosomal molecules are still noticeably present, but then those are very hard to remove completely.
                  That's very interesting - what was the kit that you used with that amount of total RNA? Also, what was the end-quantity of mRNA? Thanks for your help!

                  Comment

                  • shurjo
                    Senior Member
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 132

                    #10
                    Originally posted by dobbr493 View Post
                    That's very interesting - what was the kit that you used with that amount of total RNA? Also, what was the end-quantity of mRNA? Thanks for your help!
                    I used the DynaBeads kit from Invitrogen with 2 rounds of purification. mRNA yield from 10ug of total RNA with RIN=10 was about 120ng.

                    HTH,

                    Shurjo

                    Comment

                    • Ecap
                      Junior Member
                      • Apr 2012
                      • 2

                      #11
                      Hello,

                      I've observed bioanalyzer signatures very similar to yours when I've analyzed post-poly(A) selected total RNA samples in high salt and/or incompatible buffers.

                      For me, ethanol precipitation followed by sample reconstitution in a clean buffer (or water) totally solved the problem.

                      Comment

                      • Ecap
                        Junior Member
                        • Apr 2012
                        • 2

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Ecap View Post
                        Hello,

                        I've observed bioanalyzer signatures very similar to yours when I've analyzed post-poly(A) selected total RNA samples in high salt and/or incompatible buffers.

                        For me, ethanol precipitation followed by sample reconstitution in a clean buffer (or water) totally solved the problem.
                        I forgot to mention that in this case I was also using samples whose concentration were equal to or lesser than yours

                        Comment

                        Latest Articles

                        Collapse

                        • SEQadmin2
                          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
                          by SEQadmin2



                          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

                          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
                          ...
                          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
                        • SEQadmin2
                          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
                          by SEQadmin2


                          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

                          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
                          ...
                          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

                        ad_right_rmr

                        Collapse

                        News

                        Collapse

                        Topics Statistics Last Post
                        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:52 AM
                        0 responses
                        8 views
                        0 reactions
                        Last Post SEQadmin2  
                        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
                        0 responses
                        19 views
                        0 reactions
                        Last Post SEQadmin2  
                        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-13-2026, 09:56 AM
                        0 responses
                        15 views
                        0 reactions
                        Last Post SEQadmin2  
                        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-09-2026, 11:14 AM
                        0 responses
                        27 views
                        0 reactions
                        Last Post SEQadmin2  
                        Working...