Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • hawainpanda
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 2

    repeating chipseq or chipseq with another antibody

    I was wondering which was the preferred method?
    Would people prefer performing chipseq with two diff antibodies, or repeating chipseq with same antibody?
  • mziemann
    Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 10

    #2
    Not sure what you mean. Once an antibody is validated as specific, it should be fine to use. The more biological and technical replicates you perform the better.

    Comment

    • kerplunk412
      Senior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 119

      #3
      As a reviewer, ChIP-Seq with a different antibody would definitely add strength to a manuscript. Biological triplicates with both antibodies would be ideal. I think people sometimes put too much faith in antibody specificity, so I think data generated with two different antibodies is much more convincing. Also, an IP-Western with an IP done with one antibody and the Western done with another is always a strong piece of data to add to a manuscript, in my opinion.

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
        by SEQadmin2


        Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


        The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
        ...
        06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      11 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      45 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
      0 responses
      105 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
      0 responses
      125 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...