Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Conny
    Junior Member
    • Jul 2011
    • 4

    study design small RNAs

    Hi!

    We want to sequence small RNAs and I'm wondering how many reads (or coverage?) are needed for a sample from a mammal to obtain a realistic small RNA profile?

    I know that it is possible to multiplex a number of samples in one lane (~60 million reads in total) on the Illumina. Is it reasonable to multiplex, for example, 6 samples in one lane for smallRNAs? This would give me ~10 million reads per sample. However, is this enough or do I need more reads?

    Thanks a lot in advance for your help!

    Cheers,

    Conny
  • pfranchini
    Member
    • May 2009
    • 19

    #2
    Hi Conny,

    I am planning to sequence many small RNA libraries with an Illumina GA and I have your same questions? Did you receive some feedback?

    Thanks in advance

    Paolo

    Comment

    • Conny
      Junior Member
      • Jul 2011
      • 4

      #3
      study design - small RNAs

      Hi Paolo,

      unfortunately, no one has replied yet, but it is vacation time, I guess. I'm discussing things with some other people and as soon as I have some answers, I will post them on SEQanswers. It seems that the literature out there is not really helpful in this regard or I'm not finding the appropiate articles....

      Cheers,

      Conny

      Comment

      • GenomicIBK
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2011
        • 8

        #4
        Bringing this thread up, I have the same question.

        I was talking to people and they told me 50 million reads for total transkription analysis should be enough.
        But, how you can downscale this for small RNA analysis, I have no idea.

        Informations about this would be highly appreciated.


        Have a nice day

        Comment

        • GenomicIBK
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2011
          • 8

          #5
          Just found the following thread:

          Comment

          • Conny
            Junior Member
            • Jul 2011
            • 4

            #6
            Hi!

            Thanks a lot for the link! That helps a lot!

            I've heard similar numbers before, so it is probably some kind of guideline. Also, it means that it is possible to multiplex several samples and make the most of each run....I'll post updates, if I find some other info.

            Have a nice weekend,

            Conny

            Originally posted by GenomicIBK View Post
            Bringing this thread up, I have the same question.

            I was talking to people and they told me 50 million reads for total transkription analysis should be enough.
            But, how you can downscale this for small RNA analysis, I have no idea.

            Informations about this would be highly appreciated.


            Have a nice day

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            30 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            17 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            34 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...