Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mindbomb
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2011
    • 6

    #1

    Denatured or native protein in ChIP

    I'm a bit confused about the effect of formaldehyde crosslinking on protein conformation (in ChIPseq experiments).

    Do I understand it correctly that formaldehyde only partially denatures the proteins?

    Is there any information on how resistant is such DNA-protein cross-linked state to further changes in protein conformation?

    In example would the addition of EDTA to a zinc-finger protein open the DNA binding pocket and release the chromatin fragment?

    What about SDS? I have heard that crosslinked DNA-protein is resistant to SDS, yet others seem to claim that SDS increases the availability of specific protein areas to antibodies in subsequent bead-binding. If so, then wouldn't SDS also alter DNA binding stability?

    Looking forward to your input!

    Thanks
  • mudshark
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 138

    #2
    whatever is crosslinked remains covalently attached (until physico-chemical reversal). if your protein is fixed to DNA a conformational change will not disrupt the DNA interaction. Accordingly, the addition of EDTA will not release the DNA if the DNA has been crosslinked before and your crosslinker is not sensitive to EDTA.

    even though the crosslink can potentially lead to partial unfolding of the protein I would not call crosslinking a denaturing procedure in the first place. I guess that's too much of a stochastic event.

    In fact many ChIP protocols have SDS included in the IP. This will (partially) denature the protein and may help exposing epitopes for antibody binding. However, SDS does not affect the crosslink.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • SEQadmin2
      Beyond CRISPR/Cas9: Understand, Choose, and Use the Right Genome Editing Tool
      by SEQadmin2



      CRISPR/Cas9 sparked the gene editing revolution for both research and therapeutics.1 But this system still showed severe issues that limited its applications. The most prominent were the heavy reliance on PAM sequences, delivery limitations, double-stranded breaks that prompt unintended edits and cell death, and editing inefficiency (both in targeting and in knock-in reliability).

      Despite this, “CRISPR helped turn genome editing from a specialized technique into
      ...
      07-31-2026, 11:01 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Proteomic Platforms: How to Choose the Right Analytical Strategy to Improve Detection and Clinical Applications
      by SEQadmin2


      Proteomics platforms are evolving rapidly, with advances in mass spectrometry and affinity-based approaches expanding what researchers can detect and at what scale. As the field moves toward deeper proteome coverage and clinical applications, scientists face an increasingly complex landscape of tools. This article will explore how researchers are navigating these choices to find the right platform for their work.

      The systematic characterization of the human proteome has
      ...
      07-20-2026, 11:48 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-11-2026, 10:35 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-06-2026, 07:41 AM
    0 responses
    30 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 08-03-2026, 10:13 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 07-31-2026, 02:55 AM
    0 responses
    48 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...