Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ETHANol
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2010
    • 308

    #16
    I've jsut stated using the Covaris for chromatin fragmentation and so far I'm very impressed with the results. The reproducibility between samples is impressive.

    What I am wondering is what are the advantages/disavantages of using the Covaris vs. chemical methods for shearing RNA for RNA-seq library preparation?
    --------------
    Ethan

    Comment

    • aleferna
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 121

      #17
      Originally posted by ETHANol View Post
      I've jsut stated using the Covaris for chromatin fragmentation and so far I'm very impressed with the results. The reproducibility between samples is impressive.

      What I am wondering is what are the advantages/disavantages of using the Covaris vs. chemical methods for shearing RNA for RNA-seq library preparation?
      never got a answer for this, so what is better Covaris or the chemical/heat fragmentation? ?

      Comment

      • Hamid
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 108

        #18
        Physical shearing is better since it is concentration independent, isothermal, easily controllable as compared to chemical methods, and you don't have to deal with the stringent cleanup methods required after chemical/heat fragmentation.

        Thank you.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        12 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        15 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        54 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...