Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • cascoamarillo
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 164

    Weird library with ScriptSeq

    Hi,

    I'm wondering if anyone else has obtained a result like this in a library construction. Also, a target of this post is the Epicentre tech assist.

    I've been contructing a library with ScripSeq Library Preparation kit (Illumina-compatible) from Epicentre. The starting material was rRNA depleted (from Trizol total RNA extraction). The initial RNA and rRNA depleted sample looks good in the bioanalyzer. But after following the protocol and purify the library with XP beads (I also tried MinElute columns, with same result but a lot of primer-dimers), the library pattern does not look good. Attached is the bioanalizer trace from one of the samples (with 15 cycles in the PCR amplification step, having already used between 10-15).

    Thanks
    Attached Files
  • Olaf Blue
    Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 58

    #2
    Hello-

    Can you tell me which product was used to perform rRNA removal, and which ScriptSeq Kit was used to generate the library? Was the original total RNA treated with DNAse I after the trizol extraction? Just some basic questions to gather information to help with finding any issues.

    Comment

    • cascoamarillo
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2010
      • 164

      #3
      Sure!

      I use The RiboMinus™ Eukaryote Kit for RNA-Seq (Invitrogen) to perform the rRNA removal. I work with a fungi, and I've also try The Ribo-Zero™ rRNA Removal Kits (Human/Mouse/Rat) non-magnetic; but with poor rRNA remove.

      The kit is The ScriptSeq™ mRNA-Seq Library Preparation Kit (Illumina®-compatible), the version 1.

      And no, the original RNA was not treated with DNaseI (it's considered for the future).

      Thanks

      Comment

      • Olaf Blue
        Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 58

        #4
        Hi, thanks for the reply! I'd definitely recommend a DNAse I treatment of your RNA - we've recommended that in the past and it has definitely helped improve the library as it is possible that the cDNA synthesis primer can bind to residual DNA and get extended and thus create a segment of your library.

        Rather than using Ribo-Minus or Ribo-Zero, have you thought about using poly-A capture to remove non-mRNA species from the sample? Given the difficulty with the Ribo-Zero and Ribo-Minus Kits with the samples, the mRNA capture might be a better solution.

        Just some thoughts.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        28 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        37 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        25 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        35 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...