Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • colin.aibn
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 7

    Ribo-Zero before or after DNase treatment?

    Hi everyone,

    I have been looking at a few different protocols to process RNA samples for RNA sequencing and I am a little confused about the order of some of the steps in the process.

    I have a gram-negative bacteria that I have extracted RNA from using an RNeasy midi kit. I would now like to digest the DNA and deplete the 23s/16s, however, I'm not confident with which step should be done first as some protocols I have read perform rRNA removal before DNase treatment. This could be problematic because, from what I have read about rRNA removal from even large amounts of RNA initially (~5 ug), the yield can be quite low (100 -> 300 ng). It seems it would be better to first perform the DNase digestion on the RNA and get a decent yield and then rRNA deplete the sample. Otherwise, if you do it in reverse and perform the DNase digestion last you risk losing a larger percentage of your already low yield.

    Does anyone have any suggestions as to which step is best to do first?

    In which order do people normally do these steps?
  • protist
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 101

    #2
    DNase first and then rRNA deplete. Ensure that your DNase has been effective before progressing on to library prep.

    Comment

    • colin.aibn
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2012
      • 7

      #3
      Sounds good, thanks for your help.

      Comment

      • colin.aibn
        Junior Member
        • Jan 2012
        • 7

        #4
        One more question, should I precipitate and resuspend the RNA after the DNase digestion but before the rRNA depletion or just rely on the precipitation/resuspension at the end of the rRNA depletion to remove unwanted carry over like EDTA?

        Comment

        • protist
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2009
          • 101

          #5
          EDTA should not be a problem as some protocols recommend re-suspension of RNA in TE or water. The main problem would be salts (e.g., Mg2+ or guanidinium salts) or organics (e.g., phenol and ethanol). Dependent on the method you used for DNase you volume may be too large for you depletion method thus a precip or concentration would be required. Post DNase we use Zymo Clean&Concentrate RNA 5ug columns, in fact we use the columns for concentrating the fragmented RNA also - it has made a huge difference in yields especially for our bacterial RNAseq libraries.

          Comment

          • colin.aibn
            Junior Member
            • Jan 2012
            • 7

            #6
            Thanks again protist.

            I was planning on using invitrogen's amplification grade DNase I for two digestions (unless of course the first digestion is good enough). What I might do, instead of doing a precipitation between digestions, is use the zymo clean & concentrate column to reconcentrate the first digestion and then take the second digestion directly into the ribo-zero degradation and clean it up at the end, as the ribo-zero kit recommends, with the zymo clean and concentrate kit.

            Do you see any problems with doing that?

            Comment

            • protist
              Senior Member
              • Jan 2009
              • 101

              #7
              Originally posted by colin.aibn View Post
              Thanks again protist.

              I was planning on using invitrogen's amplification grade DNase I for two digestions (unless of course the first digestion is good enough). What I might do, instead of doing a precipitation between digestions, is use the zymo clean & concentrate column to reconcentrate the first digestion and then take the second digestion directly into the ribo-zero degradation and clean it up at the end, as the ribo-zero kit recommends, with the zymo clean and concentrate kit.

              Do you see any problems with doing that?
              Sounds good to me - although you may not need to clean-up in between your two DNase steps.. There are various flavours of Zymo RNA columns - the 5 ug are good for up to 5 ug RNA and you can elute in as little as 6 uL but I also use the 25 ug RNA column variants for larger scale RNA preps. We use Roche/USB recombinant DNase and either phenol extract or pass through RNA column for clean-up. We check our RNA with a quick PCR to check for DNA contamination before proceeding with library prep - we learned the hard way when a set of our bacterial libraries turned out to be more reflective of genome than transcriptome! We have only converted to RiboZero in the last few months and I have to say it is brilliant. Are you using the metabacteria or the Gram negative kit?

              Comment

              • colin.aibn
                Junior Member
                • Jan 2012
                • 7

                #8
                I'm using the gram negative kit. Glad to hear its working well for you.

                How many amplicons do you look at in your pcr and what length are they? I was going to run a pcr before DNase treatment and after treatment so I can see how the digestion works using 3 amplicons of about 60 to 70 nt. I'm also making sure that the EDTA conc. from the inactivation step stays between 1.5mM and 2 mM

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.


                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  From Collection to Sequencing: Why Sample Preparation and Preservation Define Sequencing Data
                  by SEQadmin2


                  Data variability is still an issue in sequencing technologies despite the advances in reproducibility and accuracy of these platforms. But the problem does not originate in the sequencing itself, but in the previous steps, before the sample reaches the sequencer.


                  The first step is collection, followed by preservation and sample preparation for analysis. Most scientists overlook those steps, but not being careful might just be skewing the experiment’s results.
                  ...
                  06-02-2026, 10:05 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
                0 responses
                26 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-09-2026, 11:58 AM
                0 responses
                44 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-05-2026, 10:09 AM
                0 responses
                48 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-04-2026, 08:59 AM
                0 responses
                49 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...