I saw primer dimer in my library on bioanalyzer. If I do not want to re make the library, should I re do the size selection or purify it with ampure beads? Which one is better (cleaner and recovers more)? Thanks a lot!
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
Purify with Ampure XP at 1:1 - 1.2:1. We use 1:1 based on the Illumina mRNAseq prep recommendations, another contributor on the site (ETHANol) has made an absolutely excellent CHIP-seq protocol available and used 1.2:1 as a final purification step.
-
-
That is correct, for absolute clarification;
1 volume Ampure XP : 1 volume Library
for an equally good separation of the dimer with a bit better recovery, no idea of this is true but I've come to trust ETHANol's suggestions
1.2 volumes Ampure XP : 1 volume library
Comment
-
-
The complexity of your library would be limited by the number of amplifiable library molecules pre-amplification. If you happen to be able to see the library at this point on a bioanalyzer high sensitivity chip, you could estimate your maximum complexity. 100 pg is about 100 million 1 kbp molecules.
One the one hand, it would be better to remove the adapter dimer before PCR, so you don't get any of it annealing to full length library molecules and escaping later size selection.
On the other hand, if you do the PCR first, then the amount of DNA you are working with is higher. Generally it is easier to deal with higher concentration DNA than lower concentration. (At least in the low nM range and below.)
--
Phillip
Comment
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.
There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...-
Channel: Articles
Yesterday, 05:17 AM -
-
by GATTACATLove this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
-
Channel: Articles
07-01-2026, 11:43 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.
Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...-
Channel: Articles
-
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
|
0 responses
6 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
Yesterday, 10:08 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
|
0 responses
8 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
|
0 responses
31 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
|
0 responses
29 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
|
Comment