Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lavagirl
    Junior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 5

    Primer dimer in ChIP-seq library

    I saw primer dimer in my library on bioanalyzer. If I do not want to re make the library, should I re do the size selection or purify it with ampure beads? Which one is better (cleaner and recovers more)? Thanks a lot!
  • Jon_Keats
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2010
    • 279

    #2
    Purify with Ampure XP at 1:1 - 1.2:1. We use 1:1 based on the Illumina mRNAseq prep recommendations, another contributor on the site (ETHANol) has made an absolutely excellent CHIP-seq protocol available and used 1.2:1 as a final purification step.

    Comment

    • lavagirl
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 5

      #3
      Thanks a million!

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        Which is 1.2x, the AmPure or the sample?

        Comment

        • Veleno
          Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 16

          #5
          Normally AMPure and then sample.

          Comment

          • Jon_Keats
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2010
            • 279

            #6
            That is correct, for absolute clarification;

            1 volume Ampure XP : 1 volume Library

            for an equally good separation of the dimer with a bit better recovery, no idea of this is true but I've come to trust ETHANol's suggestions

            1.2 volumes Ampure XP : 1 volume library

            Comment

            • ge2sasag
              Member
              • Apr 2013
              • 43

              #7
              I have one question about this, if you purify directly the library, do you have enough complexity? because you are amplifying many primer molecules instead DNA molecules.

              Comment

              • pmiguel
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2008
                • 2328

                #8
                The complexity of your library would be limited by the number of amplifiable library molecules pre-amplification. If you happen to be able to see the library at this point on a bioanalyzer high sensitivity chip, you could estimate your maximum complexity. 100 pg is about 100 million 1 kbp molecules.

                One the one hand, it would be better to remove the adapter dimer before PCR, so you don't get any of it annealing to full length library molecules and escaping later size selection.

                On the other hand, if you do the PCR first, then the amount of DNA you are working with is higher. Generally it is easier to deal with higher concentration DNA than lower concentration. (At least in the low nM range and below.)

                --
                Phillip

                Comment

                Latest Articles

                Collapse

                • SEQadmin2
                  Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                  by SEQadmin2



                  Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                  There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                  Yesterday, 05:17 AM
                • GATTACAT
                  Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by GATTACAT
                  Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                  07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
                • SEQadmin2
                  Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                  by SEQadmin2


                  I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

                  Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
                  06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

                ad_right_rmr

                Collapse

                News

                Collapse

                Topics Statistics Last Post
                Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:08 AM
                0 responses
                6 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                0 responses
                8 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
                0 responses
                31 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
                0 responses
                29 views
                0 reactions
                Last Post SEQadmin2  
                Working...