Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ScottC
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2008
    • 244

    #16
    Amplicons of 1-1.5 kb should not be a challenge for Nextera, as we have gone as low as a few hundred bp
    Won't it have to be only a few hundred bases for Illumina library preps?
    Also, do you have any idea about the release date for this product?

    Scott.

    Comment

    • Lestag
      Junior Member
      • Apr 2009
      • 3

      #17
      Scott, you're correct about the final tagged fragment length, but the process allows simultaneous fragmentation and tagging from a range of original DNA sizes. Remember that a modified transposome is breaks the input DNA and insert tags.
      Release will be soon...

      Comment

      • ScottC
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2008
        • 244

        #18
        Hi Lestag,

        Yes, I understand how it works... I just misread your statement! For some reason, I thought you were saying that you'd fragmented larger DNA to result in 1.5kb fragments at the end of the process!

        Having re-read it, I now see that you were talking about 1.5kb starting material size, not the final 'tagmented' size range.

        Cheers,

        Scott.

        Comment

        • berthold
          Junior Member
          • Mar 2011
          • 5

          #19
          Perl script available for "digesting" fastq files?

          Hi,

          I'd like to come back to this thread. I've done it - mixed a lot of different PCR reactions (with different primers), and had them co-ligated, fragmented and Illumina-sequenced by a service provider. The reads now match nicely to PCR template references, but because of the chimeric reads (I guess), coverage drops at the starts and ends of each fragment.

          I thought it should be possible to tweak a Perl script that creates restriction fragments for the purpose of splitting up the chimeric reads, because the co-ligation joints, made up of 2 primer sequences each, resemble restriction sites in a way. I am new to Perl too - does anybody have a script that "digests" fastq files (creates fastq files containing the restrition fragments)? I guess I could feed my own primer sequences into such a script, but I don't think I'll be able to write it from scratch. I am aware such a thing may run for a while, but I'd like to give it a try.

          grateful for any help - cheers,
          Berthold

          Comment

          • sci_guy
            Member
            • Jan 2008
            • 83

            #20
            Hi Berthold,

            At least three ways to do it.
            1) Write a Perl script to remove exact matches. Parse the FASTQ, and look for the primer in each read with regular expressions. Trim the reads with hits using the regular expression result. Very fast run time.
            2) Write a Perl script to remove inexact matches. As above with an extra check on reads without exact matches for inexact matches. This will run much slower. Can use an approximate match library or BioPerl and perform alignments to your primer. Considerably trickier to write for a novice programmer.
            3) Upload the FASTQ data into Galaxy. Under the "NGS: QC and manipulation" section use the "Clip adapter sequences" tool. Too easy.

            If you take the trickier programming route I have some scripts in Perl and/or Python that I could send to get you started.

            Cheers,
            Jason.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by SEQadmin2


              I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

              Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
              06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
            0 responses
            12 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
            0 responses
            14 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
            0 responses
            20 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
            0 responses
            54 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...