Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • CC_seqanswers
    Member
    • Jan 2011
    • 30

    RNA fragmentation using RNAse III: size issue

    I am trying to make RNA libraries for pair end sequencing(2x100). However I failed to get the RNA fragment size I need by using RNase III fragmentation. The average size of fragmented rRNA-depleted RNA is smaller than 200 nt even with half unit of RNAse III and incubation at 37C of 30seconds.

    Any ideas to yield larger size?
  • ZWB
    Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 27

    #2
    Try using NEBNext RNA fragmentation buffer. We do a 3 min incubation and get a pretty good size distribution for 100 PE runs

    Comment

    • CC_seqanswers
      Member
      • Jan 2011
      • 30

      #3
      Thank you! We have been quite succesful with NEB RNA fragmetation for pair end sequencing too.

      It's just this time we are using Ambion kits and we need to use RNaseIII.



      Originally posted by ZWB View Post
      Try using NEBNext RNA fragmentation buffer. We do a 3 min incubation and get a pretty good size distribution for 100 PE runs

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        (1) I think you already under stand this, but you can't swap out RNAseIII digestion of RNA for heat/chemical fragmentation without altering your protocol! RNAseIII produces 5'-phosphate, 3'-hydroxyl ends -- exactly what RNA ligases need. heat/chemical fragmentation and most RNAses produce 3'-phosphate, 5'-hydroxyl ends.

        (2) What is the average length of your RNA prior to RNAseIII digestion?

        You might want to try an RNAseIII minus control reaction. That is, add all the reaction components, except RNAseIII (replace with water). Then do the normal incubation. If your RNA is still fragmenting, then it is contaminating RNAses in your RNA prep that are the problem, not the RNAseIII reaction.

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        • CC_seqanswers
          Member
          • Jan 2011
          • 30

          #5
          Thanks for your help. Pls see replies below.
          Originally posted by pmiguel View Post
          (1) I think you already under stand this, but you can't swap out RNAseIII digestion of RNA for heat/chemical fragmentation without altering your protocol! RNAseIII produces 5'-phosphate, 3'-hydroxyl ends -- exactly what RNA ligases need. heat/chemical fragmentation and most RNAses produce 3'-phosphate, 5'-hydroxyl ends.

          [B]you are right.We are not swaping. RNAse III fragmentation is required for SOLID protocol, which is the same as Ambion.
          [/B](2) What is the average length of your RNA prior to RNAseIII digestion?

          You might want to try an RNAseIII minus control reaction. That is, add all the reaction components, except RNAseIII (replace with water). Then do the normal incubation. If your RNA is still fragmenting, then it is contaminating RNAses in your RNA prep that are the problem, not the RNAseIII reaction.

          [B]It's hard to tell exact average length of the ribozero RNA samples but I would say around ~500bp? Ribozero RNA samples should be RNase free, however it does not hurt to a negative test. Had thought about it but forgot .--


          B]

          Phillip

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          7 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          28 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...