Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rosmano
    Member
    • May 2012
    • 28

    #1

    Bioanalyzer results - adapter dimers in ChIP-seq library samples

    Hello all,

    I've recently found this forum and wanted to ask for feedback about the quality of the attached ChIP-seq libraries.

    The relevant information is:
    Used Bioo Scientific NextFlex Barcode Adapters with a concentration of 0.6uM for a total amount of 10ng of DNA.
    I size select the library to remove excess adapters and select a size range of templates around the 300bp size using a E-Gel Size select system
    Following the size selection I did PCR amplification for 15 cycles of half of the sample.
    Afterwards I did an Ampure bead purification to further clean up the sample of fragments with the wrong size.

    However in most of my samples I still obtained adapter dimers peaks. Since adapter dimers are undesirable since they compete with the actual sample when sequencing in the Illumina Genome Analyzer that we are going to use I wanted to know if the amount of adapter dimers found in these samples is significant and I should redo the libraries maybe with a smaller amount of adapters.

    I am also having issues with correctly determining the adequate amount of DNA in my samples: What I consistently observe is that input samples always have more DNA than IP samples in the E-Gel Recovery System even when I am always using 10ng of sample. So it's impossible to adjust the amount of DNA beforehand, if I am seeing variations only after the adapter ligation step.

    So is any of those samples usable? I would like to know specifically if sample 2 can be used since I have a very limited amount of DNA of that material.

    Thanks for the feedback.
    Attached Files
  • NextGenSeq
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 482

    #2
    Sample 2 is probably okay. We use the ultralow input kit from NuGEN and almost never see adapter dimers. How did you shear your DNA? The two peaks you get suggest over amplification but with 15 cycles you shouldn't see overamplification unless this is a very low complexity sample.

    Comment

    • Rosmano
      Member
      • May 2012
      • 28

      #3
      So what's the size of the adapter-dimer peaks that make a sample bad for sequencing?
      Is it when it is roughly the same size of the sample?

      Comment

      • Rosmano
        Member
        • May 2012
        • 28

        #4
        Originally posted by NextGenSeq View Post
        Sample 2 is probably okay. We use the ultralow input kit from NuGEN and almost never see adapter dimers. How did you shear your DNA? The two peaks you get suggest over amplification but with 15 cycles you shouldn't see overamplification unless this is a very low complexity sample.
        I shear my DNA by sonication.
        I repeated the PCR amplification (16 cycles this time) and the Ampure beads purification step with the other half of my samples. However, this time I changed the ratio of Ampure beads XL to DNA volume from 1,6:1 to 1,1:1 since I read here that decreasing the ratio can reduce the adapter dimers in the samples.

        In fact I saw a reduction in the size of the adapter dimer peaks, however I still ahd a large amount of dimers. Are there any other steps that can be taken to reduce adapter dimers besides the steps I already mentioned?
        Attached Files

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
          by SEQadmin2



          Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

          Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
          ...
          10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
          by SEQadmin2


          Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

          We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
          ...
          09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 11:13 AM
        0 responses
        26 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-22-2026, 10:48 AM
        0 responses
        20 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
        0 responses
        36 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
        0 responses
        43 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...