Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • carotylene
    Junior Member
    • Jun 2012
    • 2

    strange bioanalyzer results

    I am getting crazy with this RNA extracted from marine copepods! We used different extracting methods and kit, but always get the same bioanalyzer results: a drop off after the 18S peak. The technician said the ladder is degraded and that there can be salt contamination causing the dop. But I doubt it. Why always at the same time? Any suggestion?
    Attached Files
  • pmiguel
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2008
    • 2328

    #2
    If the ladder is degraded that is a bioanalyzer run issue. Looks to me like the bioanalyzer operator loaded the ladder well with one of the samples in your right 4 lanes.

    If you are sure that this is not an operator mistake, then my second guess would be massive contamination of the pin (electrode) set with one of your samples or samples from an earlier run of the instrument.

    My third guess would be that the chip capillaries are defective, but I guess that is unlikely.

    --
    Phillip

    Comment

    • carotylene
      Junior Member
      • Jun 2012
      • 2

      #3
      Originally posted by pmiguel View Post
      If the ladder is degraded that is a bioanalyzer run issue. Looks to me like the bioanalyzer operator loaded the ladder well with one of the samples in your right 4 lanes.

      If you are sure that this is not an operator mistake, then my second guess would be massive contamination of the pin (electrode) set with one of your samples or samples from an earlier run of the instrument.

      My third guess would be that the chip capillaries are defective, but I guess that is unlikely.

      --
      Phillip
      Dear Phillip,
      you are totally right for the right 4 lanes, but it is the other way round, the operator loaded the ladder also on those 4 lanes to check it.
      As for your other guesses, I will discuss it with the operator. We are still waiting for the company operator to come!
      I'll let know the development.
      Many thanks for your reply!

      Comment

      • pmiguel
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2008
        • 2328

        #4
        Okay, I get it.

        Yes your samples also look degraded.

        When is the last time you washed the pins? That is, taken them out and sonicated them and/or otherwise scrubbed them to clean them? (Agilent has protocols available.)

        We do that about once a week. Down side is that if even the slightest moisture remains on the pin set, the next run will be ruined. So we try to do the washing just before a weekend so the pins can dry for a couple of days. Otherwise you might have to do an ethanol rinse followed by a few hours in a vacuum to remove all moisture from the pins.

        Also, many bioanalyzer facilities keep different pin sets for RNA and DNA. DNA is frequently contaminated with RNAse, so you really don't want to do a DNA chip and follow it with an RNA chip. The little RNAzap wash wells can only do so much.

        --
        Phillip

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by SEQadmin2


          I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

          Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
          06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:08 AM
        0 responses
        7 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
        0 responses
        11 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
        0 responses
        19 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
        0 responses
        53 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...