Hi, I am having problem with the TruSeq RNA kit lately - some of the adaptors totally failed and show funny "ladder-like" bands after PCR amplification (attached pic 1-2 show traces, pic 6 show virtual gel). Others seems to have worked and created a library but the peak looks rather odd and having "spikes" (attached pic 4-5). Has anyone encountered similar problem and figured out what was wrong? Any idea is appreciated!
Unconfigured Ad
Collapse
X
-
TruSeq kits offer the option to spike in control DNAs. Not sure if the sizes match your "ladders", but seems plausible. Did you use the control DNA?Originally posted by yhuang1 View PostHi, I am having problem with the TruSeq RNA kit lately - some of the adaptors totally failed and show funny "ladder-like" bands after PCR amplification (attached pic 1-2 show traces, pic 6 show virtual gel). Others seems to have worked and created a library but the peak looks rather odd and having "spikes" (attached pic 4-5). Has anyone encountered similar problem and figured out what was wrong? Any idea is appreciated!
--
Phillip
-
-
Thanks for the reply Philip -
I did not use the spike in control. I never thought they are very useful - you find out what was wrong after the sequencing - if you are able to get to the sequencing step, that means the library prep must have been successful anyway.
My own guess of the ladder-like bands and spiky peaks is that they are adaptors which somehow ligated to themselves. Different molecular weight probably represent different copies of self-ligated adaptors. But it is just a guess. I was hoping to see if someone has similar problem and already found out the answer.
Yanmei
Comment
-
-
We do several hundred RNA libraries a month and we had this same issue pop up with only a few adapters in a kit, not all. We were able to show it was not sample related by having the same starting sample split and made into different libraries to look at possible index bias. Illumina said it was an adapter quality problem and replaced the RNA-seq kits.
Comment
-
-
Thanks a lot for the information!! I indeed strongly believe the problem came from the kit and most likely the adaptors. My starting RNAs are of great quality based on bioanalyzer. I myself have used up one kit before and in that kit only two of the adaptors had the problem. I actually ordered oligos from IDT and made the adaptor myself and it worked. However, this time almost half of 12 adaptors are completely bad and the other 5 gave "spiky" products. Only one adaptor produced a library with nice, smooth peak in bioanalyzer. It would cost us a fortune to remake all those adaptors ourself. It is good to know that Illumina would replace the bad kit. But even if they do, it is still a terrible thing that the users wasted a tremendous amount of time and precious samples!
Comment
-
-
There is no way to know beforehand which adaptor might have the problem because the problem did not come from the adaptor sequence. I have used the same adaptor (for example, index 2) from two different kits; one worked well while the other failed. It is probably a random quality issue. If your sample is precious, you probably should try the whole procedure on some other easy-to-get RNA samples first. In my experience, once you find out one adaptor works, it works every time. The failing adaptors fail everytime on all different RNA samples I have tried (that's another reason why I am very sure that the problem did not come from my RNA).
Comment
-
-
Not quite. The sequencing can seem to go just fine until you look at the output and just see a lot of the same adapter sequence. That tends to happen when we sequence those sawtooth pattern libraries.Originally posted by yhuang1 View PostThanks for the reply Philip -
...if you are able to get to the sequencing step, that means the library prep must have been successful anyway.
Comment
-
Latest Articles
Collapse
-
by SEQadmin2
Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
...-
Channel: Articles
07-09-2026, 11:10 AM -
-
by SEQadmin2
Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.
There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...-
Channel: Articles
07-08-2026, 05:17 AM -
-
by GATTACATLove this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
-
Channel: Articles
07-01-2026, 11:43 AM -
ad_right_rmr
Collapse
News
Collapse
| Topics | Statistics | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
|
0 responses
20 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
|
0 responses
30 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
|
0 responses
17 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
|
||
|
Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
|
0 responses
34 views
0 reactions
|
Last Post
by SEQadmin2
07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
|
Comment