Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bia
    Junior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 5

    HydroShear - 8 kb PE library

    Hi everybody,
    to prepare the 8 kb PE library the DNA have to be fragmented to 8 kb of size using the hydroshear, I know this is a critical step.
    Do you have suggestion or tips to do this?
    Does anyone tried an alternative method to obtain the fragments in the right size range?
    Thanks,
    bia
    Last edited by bia; 09-10-2009, 05:29 AM.
  • nedoluzhko
    Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 22

    #2
    So I have same problem, please help to us...

    Comment

    • pmiguel
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 2328

      #3
      Originally posted by nedoluzhko View Post
      So I have same problem, please help to us...
      What problem are you having? Is it that you do not have a Hydroshear? Or is it not giving you the size range that you want.

      Typically Hydroshear will give DNA fragments of a size range where the low end is 1/2 the size of the high end. So for 8 kb fragments you would hope to see a range from around 6-12 kb.

      If you do not have a Hydroshear, you might use an enzymatic shearing method such as dsFragmentase from New England Biolabs instead.

      --
      Phillip

      Comment

      • Marta
        Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 17

        #4
        I tested NEB Fragmentase for generation of long DNA fragments: (http://www.genomecenter.ucdavis.edu/...g_protocol.pdf )

        Marta

        Comment

        • pmiguel
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2008
          • 2328

          #5
          Originally posted by Marta View Post
          I tested NEB Fragmentase for generation of long DNA fragments: (http://www.genomecenter.ucdavis.edu/...g_protocol.pdf )

          Marta
          Yes, that shows it does work.

          What makes hydroshear great is that it does fragment to a (moderately) tight size range. Fragmentase can cleave anywhere on a DNA strand, so you get plenty of fragments down below 1 kb whereas hydroshear only fragments DNA larger than a certain size. (That size being determined by the "Speed Code", the speed at which the solution is being force through the pore).

          Anyway, for many experiments, the amount of DNA will not be limiting. And if you have lots of samples the hydroshear does not scale very well. Whereas enzymatic reactions are easily scaled.

          I should add, that back in 1998, during the set up of the Purdue Genomics Core, the hydroshear was probably the only instrument I plugged in, hooked up to a computer and had it perform exactly as specified without tinkering with it for days, weeks or months. (Well, it did require one phone call to GeneMachines to ask how to get rid of a particular sort of bubble.)

          There are a few problems one can run into with the hydroshear. But it always seemed to have a much more limited "failure space" to blunder into than most instrumentation I've had to deal with. But it could be my attitude is colored by that initial, easy success back in the days when almost nothing was working right.
          --
          Phillip

          Comment

          Latest Articles

          Collapse

          • GATTACAT
            Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by GATTACAT
            Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
            07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
          • SEQadmin2
            Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
            by SEQadmin2


            I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

            Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
            06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

          ad_right_rmr

          Collapse

          News

          Collapse

          Topics Statistics Last Post
          Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:05 AM
          0 responses
          6 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
          0 responses
          27 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
          0 responses
          25 views
          0 reactions
          Last Post SEQadmin2  
          Working...