Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • erlandsen
    Junior Member
    • Oct 2011
    • 6

    DNA Shearing Results Covaris M220

    Hi,

    I have just started shearing my DNA for downstream exome library preparation.

    I used the illumina recommended protocol on the Covaris M220 instrument, aiming at peak top at ~250 bp.

    Then I checked the samples on High Sensitivity chip(bioanalyzer) and got the results as in the attachment.

    Of what I have seen in other threads it looks generally ok, but I puzzled about the shift in the "graph shoulder" on some samples?

    Any comment on the results in general and on the issue I pointed out will be appreciated.

    Ragards,
    see
    Attached Files
  • addyblanch
    Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 29

    #2
    I think they look correct, the movement in the "shoulder" would just be down to the amount of fragments at that size. They'll never all be the same but as long as the average size is your target, it'll be fine.

    Comment

    • Anna Maria
      Junior Member
      • Jan 2010
      • 2

      #3
      DNA shearing results in M220

      Hi,

      It looks that you overloaded the HS Bioanalyzer chip hence the "funny" shape of the peaks. When performing the analysis of DNA fragments on the High Sensitivity chip it is very important to use the small amounts of DNA to prevent overloading of the chip that causes all kinds of migration artifacts.
      When the proper amount of DNA is loaded the top of the peak should be below the top of Lower and Upper Markers. In your case the sample peak is dwarfing the markers. I am quite sure that if you dilute your samples 1:10 and run them again all peaks will look the same.
      Your DNA shearing was good, the problem is the analysis of fragmented DNA.

      Anna

      Comment

      • cement_head
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2012
        • 264

        #4
        Originally posted by Anna Maria View Post
        Hi,

        It looks that you overloaded the HS Bioanalyzer chip hence the "funny" shape of the peaks. When performing the analysis of DNA fragments on the High Sensitivity chip it is very important to use the small amounts of DNA to prevent overloading of the chip that causes all kinds of migration artifacts.
        When the proper amount of DNA is loaded the top of the peak should be below the top of Lower and Upper Markers. In your case the sample peak is dwarfing the markers. I am quite sure that if you dilute your samples 1:10 and run them again all peaks will look the same.
        Your DNA shearing was good, the problem is the analysis of fragmented DNA.

        Anna
        Yep, that's what we've found - don't overload the HS DNA chip.

        Comment

        Latest Articles

        Collapse

        • SEQadmin2
          Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
          by SEQadmin2



          Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
          ...
          07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
        • SEQadmin2
          Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
          by SEQadmin2



          Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

          There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
          07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
        • GATTACAT
          Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
          by GATTACAT
          Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
          07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

        ad_right_rmr

        Collapse

        News

        Collapse

        Topics Statistics Last Post
        Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:26 AM
        0 responses
        9 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
        0 responses
        24 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
        0 responses
        16 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
        0 responses
        33 views
        0 reactions
        Last Post SEQadmin2  
        Working...