Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Manna
    Member
    • Feb 2013
    • 15

    Best Way to make Mate-Pair library?

    What do people think is the best way to make a mate-pair library? I need to do some with 3 and/or 6 kb inserts and probably at least one with a larger 10kb insert. Are there any consistent problems with the Nextera kit? How do the data you get from the Nextera kit compare with other kits? What's the word on the street?

    Thanks!
    m
  • ychang
    Member
    • Oct 2010
    • 17

    #2
    we have succeed make 4-7kb mate-pair lib with Nextera kit, and will try 10kb this week.

    Comment

    • aammar
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 1

      #3
      Hi ychang,

      I just started using the Nextera MP kit. How did you manage that short of kb insert? I get them on the larger side. I ideally want 3-4 kb insert size. Suggestions? Thank you in advance!

      Comment

      • jjcooper
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2012
        • 2

        #4
        Hi ychang,
        Did you have any luck with the 10 kb prep?
        Hi aammar,
        What size do your insert sizes usually end up? are you using the gel-plus protocol?
        Thanks

        Comment

        • MLog
          Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 36

          #5
          Hi ychang (and everyone who has experience with Nextera MP, too),
          did you already sequenced and mapped these libraries? I wonder how many reads mapped with expected insert size?
          I tried Nextera MP for the first time, but the results are a bit disappointing - only ~ 40% of reads map in correct orientation and with expected insert size. The rest 60% seem to be short fragments that yield standard paired-end reads.
          Attached Files

          Comment

          • Ama
            Junior Member
            • Jun 2010
            • 1

            #6
            Hi

            @MLog: I assume you removed the junction adapters of the nextera data before you did the mapping, can you please let me know what tools/approach you used for that? I been following the technical notes to trim the adapters off and to identify the reads orientation RF/FR, but the results I am seeing are very disappointing. So any help would be much appreciated.
            Thanks

            Comment

            • jjcooper
              Junior Member
              • Oct 2012
              • 2

              #7
              @MLog,
              Did you do the gel-free or gel-plus protocol? How did your QCs with the Bioanalyzer look?

              Comment

              • syfo
                Just a member
                • Nov 2012
                • 103

                #8
                You might also need to reverse complement the reads before mapping them because some aligners expect the mates to be in a convergent orientation (head-to-head).

                Comment

                • sara_ahmed
                  Member
                  • Nov 2011
                  • 13

                  #9
                  What is the circularization efficiency using the Nextera MP protocol? Is there a way to assess that in the protocol?

                  Comment

                  • hfaoro
                    Junior Member
                    • Jun 2011
                    • 4

                    #10
                    Hi,
                    About nextera MP protocol, does anyone knows if is it possible to use covaris microTUBE with fiber, instead of T6 tube, to shear the DNA after circularization step?

                    Comment

                    • BobS
                      Junior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 5

                      #11
                      hfaoro , we used to use microTubes also.
                      Covaris Fragmentation for about 400bp fragments: For each 300ul + 9ul + 12ul reaction add 80 ul TE to bring volume up to near 400 ul microTube. Load 3 , 6 x 16 mm MicroTubes per sample 3 x 130ul = 390ul

                      Covaris E210 settings for ~400 bp fragments
                      5% Duty Cycle, 3 Intensity, 200 Cycles per burst, 110 sec. duration water cooled at 6 - 8 deg C. You probably will have to tweak your settings.

                      Comment

                      Latest Articles

                      Collapse

                      • SEQadmin2
                        Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
                        by SEQadmin2



                        Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
                        ...
                        07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
                      • SEQadmin2
                        Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
                        by SEQadmin2



                        Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

                        There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
                        07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
                      • GATTACAT
                        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
                        by GATTACAT
                        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
                        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

                      ad_right_rmr

                      Collapse

                      News

                      Collapse

                      Topics Statistics Last Post
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-13-2026, 10:26 AM
                      0 responses
                      28 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
                      0 responses
                      37 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
                      0 responses
                      25 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
                      0 responses
                      35 views
                      0 reactions
                      Last Post SEQadmin2  
                      Working...