Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • emucaki
    Member
    • Apr 2009
    • 12

    #1

    Multiplex Sample Prep: Three Primer Method question

    There is an older library prep method where samples were indexed using a 3 primer PCR method (forward and reverse primer + index primer). Illumina changed this, and I've seen people on SeqAnswers complain that it was inefficient. Unfortunately, those are the only primer types I have right now.

    1) Do any labs have experience with this method, and have any tips dealing with these issues?

    2) I assume that the 3 primers exist in equal amounts, but the protocol does not actually list concentrations (just volumes). Does anyone know if the primer concentrations should be equal for this amplification.

    Thank you.
  • kcchan
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2012
    • 186

    #2
    Wow, that is a very old protocol. From what I remember, the three oligos are of equal concentration in the PCR reaction. The process was really tacked on and thus very inefficient since fragments that don't get the index sequence will not cluster. I believe that these libraries also require a primer that is different from TruSeq, but it may still be included in the standard sequencing primer mix. Nowadays all of the necessary sequences are added during the ligation step; PCR is optional and only used to amplify the yield. I would only use this method if you have no other alternative.

    Comment

    • beibeizhou
      Junior Member
      • Mar 2013
      • 2

      #3
      three primers are not the same concentration.primer 1.0 and multiplex primer are 25uM,primer 2.0 is 0.5 uM

      Comment

      • emucaki
        Member
        • Apr 2009
        • 12

        #4
        Thank you for the responses.

        Having the 2.0 primer at a lower concentration makes sense, as it creates the binding site for the indexing primer to amplify. However, since I'm getting conflicting results, I wanted to ask again if anyone could confirm the primer concentrations.

        The "Illumina Customer Sequence Letter" lists TruSeq adapters with the index already present. Are those the ones that should be used instead of this older method? They do not seem to mention the phosphorylated 5' end as all the others require. Anyone know why this is?

        Comment

        • kcchan
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2012
          • 186

          #5
          The sequences you're looking for with the older kit are in the section labeled "Oligonucleotide sequences for the Multiplexing Sample Prep Oligo Only Kit". The newer TruSeq adapters already have the index sequences in the forked adapter.

          The adapters in the sequence letter are really only meant for QC and data filtering purposes. They don't disclose the modifications required to actually design some of the primers.

          Comment

          • emucaki
            Member
            • Apr 2009
            • 12

            #6
            We are performing a sequence capture step, so do you think this would improve amplification efficiency:
            - amplify (PCR 1) with the forward and reverse primers normally
            - capture sequence (with appropriate blocking primers, of course)
            - amplify (PCR 2) this captured library DNA with the forward primer and the appropriate indexing primer (which hybridizes to a binding site left by the reverse primer overhang)

            This way, we never have 3 primers in the PCR solution at once. The only downside is that I have to capture 1 sample per tube instead of pooling, which will help overall capture efficiency but increases work/costs involved.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Multiomic Liquid Biopsy: What DNA/RNA Panels Reveal That DNA Alone Can’t
              by SEQadmin2



              Tumors contain complex mixtures of cell populations that evolve in response to treatment and host-specific factors. Tissue biopsies provide only static snapshots of a tumor’s state. But what if we could follow that evolution over time using a minimally invasive technique?

              Liquid biopsies can detect tumor-derived material circulating in the bloodstream, providing a way to study treatment response, detect emerging resistance, and discover new biomarkers. Circulating
              ...
              10-14-2026, 09:55 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              New Genomics Technologies Take Aim at Long-Standing Limits
              by SEQadmin2


              Researchers using sequencing and genomics tools often have to make trade-offs. They can choose between speed or scale, short reads or long-range information, or targeted panels or a view of the whole transcriptome. New technologies that have been released this year are built to address those tough choices.

              We asked six companies the same four questions to learn about their latest products. The new technologies bring a lot to the table, including rethinking sequencing
              ...
              09-28-2026, 10:25 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 11:13 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, Yesterday, 10:48 AM
            0 responses
            17 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-15-2026, 10:52 AM
            0 responses
            35 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 10-14-2026, 05:39 AM
            0 responses
            42 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...