Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • iquigley
    Junior Member
    • Sep 2010
    • 6

    Bias between NEBnext and Truseq RNA kits?

    Hey gang, I've got a bunch of samples already sequenced with libraries built with Illumina's truseq v2 kits. I have a few left to do but am running into the small-potatoes user problem of not needing 48 reactions and am thus loathe to buy another full v2 kit. I also have a strong suspicion that NEB provides the enzymes for those kits. So: has anybody here ever tried to compare libraries made by truseq with libraries of the same RNA made with NEBnext? If there's very little bias, I will be sorely tempted to go that route.

    Thanks for any insights!
  • rnaeye
    Member
    • May 2011
    • 80

    #2
    There is some data showing polymerase bias:
    Last edited by rnaeye; 08-12-2014, 04:53 PM. Reason: spelling error

    Comment

    • SeqMonster
      Member
      • Jul 2009
      • 21

      #3
      NEBNext RNA library prep kit - For Single-end or Paired-end?

      Does anyone know whether the multiplex oligos for NEBNext RNA library prep kit allow for paired-end sequencing, and compatible to MiSeq? There is only one index primer added onto the PCR reaction, together with the universal primer.

      Comment

      • DRod
        Junior Member
        • Dec 2013
        • 1

        #4
        Yes. The NEBNext multiplex oligos are compatible with paired-end sequencing and MiSeq.
        Here a link to a series of webinars you might find useful:

        Comment

        • windhorse8
          Member
          • May 2011
          • 18

          #5
          Originally posted by DRod View Post
          Yes. The NEBNext multiplex oligos are compatible with paired-end sequencing and MiSeq.
          Here a link to a series of webinars you might find useful:
          http://neb-online.de/index.php/de/neb-aktionen/260
          How about NEBnext multiplex small RNA library prep set (cat. no. E7330S) ? Is library prepared using this kit also compatible with Miseq ? Do I have to send separate custom primer since custom primer read seems to be different from what is found on Truseq universal adapter sequence.
          Thanks

          Comment

          • rnaeye
            Member
            • May 2011
            • 80

            #6
            Yes, it's compatible with Miseq. You do not need separate primers. You can give them a call to double check if you like.

            Comment

            Latest Articles

            Collapse

            • SEQadmin2
              Advanced Sequencing Platforms Tackle Neuroscience’s Toughest Genomics Problems
              by SEQadmin2



              Genomics studies in neuroscience face a special challenge due to the brain’s complexity and scarcity of samples. Mapping changes in cell type and state using conventional next-generation sequencing methods remains challenging. Advances in technologies like single-cell sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and long-read sequencing have opened the door to deeper studies of the brain and diseases like Alzheimer’s, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and schizophrenia.
              ...
              07-09-2026, 11:10 AM
            • SEQadmin2
              Cancer Drug Resistance: The Lingering Barrier to Rising Survival
              by SEQadmin2



              Cancer survival rates have significantly increased in the last few decades in the United States, reaching a combined 70% 5-year survival rate by 2021. Behind this number, there are years of research to find new therapies, drug targets, and early detection methods. But there is one core challenge that keeps slowing down these advances, and it’s about drug resistance.

              There is no single reason why many patients don’t respond to treatment as expected. Cancer is...
              07-08-2026, 05:17 AM
            • GATTACAT
              Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
              by GATTACAT
              Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
              07-01-2026, 11:43 AM

            ad_right_rmr

            Collapse

            News

            Collapse

            Topics Statistics Last Post
            Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 10:26 AM
            0 responses
            11 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-09-2026, 10:04 AM
            0 responses
            25 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-08-2026, 10:08 AM
            0 responses
            16 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Started by SEQadmin2, 07-07-2026, 11:05 AM
            0 responses
            33 views
            0 reactions
            Last Post SEQadmin2  
            Working...