Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JustinNelligan
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 4

    Weird library profile

    Hello,

    We are seeing a weird library profile - double peak + some high molecular weight smear after the range we cut. It's a chip-seq library amplified for 18 cycles - first time we see this specific profile, should we sequence it?

    Thanks!

    Click image for larger version

Name:	weird-library.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	80.9 KB
ID:	308053
  • kbusseq
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 7

    #2
    It's possible that the double peak is caused by running too much sample for the chip (I'm guessing your image is from a Bioanalyzer chip or something similar). We've seen some seriously bizarre peaks on our Bioanalyzer (some double like yours and one that was actually a triple peak) that are remedied simply by re-running the sample at a 1:5 or 1:10 dilution.

    Sometimes this eliminates all trace of a high MW smear as well, but typically I would guess that the presence of high MW fragments is due to over-amplifying the library. Do you usually amplify for 18 cycles? That is a little high in my experience (which, granted, I don't have tons of yet... ), but if it normally works for you than it might not be the issue.

    Comment

    Latest Articles

    Collapse

    • GATTACAT
      Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by GATTACAT
      Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
      Yesterday, 11:43 AM
    • SEQadmin2
      Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
      by SEQadmin2


      I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

      Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
      06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

    ad_right_rmr

    Collapse

    News

    Collapse

    Topics Statistics Last Post
    Started by SEQadmin2, Today, 11:08 AM
    0 responses
    6 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
    0 responses
    11 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
    0 responses
    18 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
    0 responses
    52 views
    0 reactions
    Last Post SEQadmin2  
    Working...