Unconfigured Ad

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mdalessio
    Member
    • Oct 2013
    • 19

    DNA ng to pM help

    Sorry to bother everyone, but I am having problems with my conversion.

    So, my sample has 0.05 ng/ul

    This is the same as 0.05 kg/L

    0.05 kg/L x 1 mol / 330 kg [based on 1 kb length ssDNA]

    = 0.000151 mol/L

    I have 100 ul of this so:

    0.000151 mol/L x 0.0001 L = 1.51 x 10^-8 M = 15.1 nM

    When I take 24 ul of this pooled sample, and add it to 576 ul of buffer, does that mean that I have...

    15.1nM x 0.000024 L = 0.0003624 nmoles

    0.0003624 nmoles / 0.0006 L (600 ul) = 2.17 x 10 ^ -7 nM

    so that is putting me at 0.000217 pM? So I need to concentrate my sample more than the kit says?

    I want to cluster at around 8 pM. So do I go: x/0.006 = 0.008nM (desired concentration
  • kwaraska
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2008
    • 131

    #2
    This is what I use

    Converting concentrations from ng/μl to nM is a common task in molecular biology labs. The need arises because quantification methods for DNA typically measure the mass per volume of nucleotides in a sample. But, many techniques (including DNA sequencing) require a known number of molecules (moles or nanomoles) to be added. As a result, we often have to convert a concentration

    Comment

    • bbeitzel
      Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 50

      #3
      .05 ng/ul is the same as .05 mg/L, not .05 kg/L

      .05 ng/ul works out to be 150 pM

      Comment

      Latest Articles

      Collapse

      • GATTACAT
        Reply to Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by GATTACAT
        Love this - good data definitely starts from good input, and poor input can only give relatively poor data. I particularly like the mention of Nanodrop/absorbance based methods for quantification. It's such a toss up if you'll get an accurate reading or what amounts to a randomly generated number, and a lot of library/sequencing related issues can be traced back to poor quant.
        07-01-2026, 11:43 AM
      • SEQadmin2
        Nine Things a Sample Prep Scientist Thinks About Before Sequencing
        by SEQadmin2


        I’m not a sequencing expert. I’m a purification scientist who uses NGS to evaluate workflows my group develops. With this perspective, we think about the sample first and the NGS workflow second. The sequencer is an exceptionally honest reporter, but it can only report on what you give it, so whether you get clean, interpretable data from an NGS workflow is largely determined before you begin.

        Here are nine questions we think about, in roughly the order they matter, before...
        06-18-2026, 07:11 AM

      ad_right_rmr

      Collapse

      News

      Collapse

      Topics Statistics Last Post
      Started by SEQadmin2, 07-02-2026, 11:08 AM
      0 responses
      25 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-30-2026, 05:37 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-26-2026, 11:10 AM
      0 responses
      23 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Started by SEQadmin2, 06-17-2026, 06:09 AM
      0 responses
      55 views
      0 reactions
      Last Post SEQadmin2  
      Working...